From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org, Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux.com, deller@gmx.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
jejb@parisc-linux.org, mingo@kernel.org, noamc@ezchip.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, penberg@kernel.org,
rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "bitops: Do not default to __clear_bit() for __clear_bit_unlock()" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 11:00:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <146031124869164@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
bitops: Do not default to __clear_bit() for __clear_bit_unlock()
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
bitops-do-not-default-to-__clear_bit-for-__clear_bit_unlock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From f75d48644c56a31731d17fa693c8175328957e1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:40:54 +0100
Subject: bitops: Do not default to __clear_bit() for __clear_bit_unlock()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
commit f75d48644c56a31731d17fa693c8175328957e1d upstream.
__clear_bit_unlock() is a special little snowflake. While it carries the
non-atomic '__' prefix, it is specifically documented to pair with
test_and_set_bit() and therefore should be 'somewhat' atomic.
Therefore the generic implementation of __clear_bit_unlock() cannot use
the fully non-atomic __clear_bit() as a default.
If an arch is able to do better; is must provide an implementation of
__clear_bit_unlock() itself.
Specifically, this came up as a result of hackbench livelock'ing in
slab_lock() on ARC with SMP + SLUB + !LLSC.
The issue was incorrect pairing of atomic ops.
slab_lock() -> bit_spin_lock() -> test_and_set_bit()
slab_unlock() -> __bit_spin_unlock() -> __clear_bit()
The non serializing __clear_bit() was getting "lost"
80543b8e: ld_s r2,[r13,0] <--- (A) Finds PG_locked is set
80543b90: or r3,r2,1 <--- (B) other core unlocks right here
80543b94: st_s r3,[r13,0] <--- (C) sets PG_locked (overwrites unlock)
Fixes ARC STAR 9000817404 (and probably more).
Reported-by: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Tested-by: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160309114054.GJ6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
@@ -29,16 +29,16 @@ do { \
* @nr: the bit to set
* @addr: the address to start counting from
*
- * This operation is like clear_bit_unlock, however it is not atomic.
- * It does provide release barrier semantics so it can be used to unlock
- * a bit lock, however it would only be used if no other CPU can modify
- * any bits in the memory until the lock is released (a good example is
- * if the bit lock itself protects access to the other bits in the word).
+ * A weaker form of clear_bit_unlock() as used by __bit_lock_unlock(). If all
+ * the bits in the word are protected by this lock some archs can use weaker
+ * ops to safely unlock.
+ *
+ * See for example x86's implementation.
*/
#define __clear_bit_unlock(nr, addr) \
do { \
- smp_mb(); \
- __clear_bit(nr, addr); \
+ smp_mb__before_atomic(); \
+ clear_bit(nr, addr); \
} while (0)
#endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_LOCK_H_ */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from peterz@infradead.org are
queue-3.14/bitops-do-not-default-to-__clear_bit-for-__clear_bit_unlock.patch
queue-3.14/x86-iopl-fix-iopl-capability-check-on-xen-pv.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-04-10 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=146031124869164@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=noamc@ezchip.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.