All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Patch "bitops: Do not default to __clear_bit() for __clear_bit_unlock()" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
@ 2016-04-10 18:00 gregkh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2016-04-10 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, Vineet.Gupta1, akpm, cl, deller, gregkh, iamjoonsoo.kim,
	jejb, mingo, noamc, paulmck, penberg, rientjes, tglx, torvalds
  Cc: stable, stable-commits


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    bitops: Do not default to __clear_bit() for __clear_bit_unlock()

to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     bitops-do-not-default-to-__clear_bit-for-__clear_bit_unlock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From f75d48644c56a31731d17fa693c8175328957e1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:40:54 +0100
Subject: bitops: Do not default to __clear_bit() for __clear_bit_unlock()

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

commit f75d48644c56a31731d17fa693c8175328957e1d upstream.

__clear_bit_unlock() is a special little snowflake. While it carries the
non-atomic '__' prefix, it is specifically documented to pair with
test_and_set_bit() and therefore should be 'somewhat' atomic.

Therefore the generic implementation of __clear_bit_unlock() cannot use
the fully non-atomic __clear_bit() as a default.

If an arch is able to do better; is must provide an implementation of
__clear_bit_unlock() itself.

Specifically, this came up as a result of hackbench livelock'ing in
slab_lock() on ARC with SMP + SLUB + !LLSC.

The issue was incorrect pairing of atomic ops.

 slab_lock() -> bit_spin_lock() -> test_and_set_bit()
 slab_unlock() -> __bit_spin_unlock() -> __clear_bit()

The non serializing __clear_bit() was getting "lost"

 80543b8e:	ld_s       r2,[r13,0] <--- (A) Finds PG_locked is set
 80543b90:	or         r3,r2,1    <--- (B) other core unlocks right here
 80543b94:	st_s       r3,[r13,0] <--- (C) sets PG_locked (overwrites unlock)

Fixes ARC STAR 9000817404 (and probably more).

Reported-by: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Tested-by: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160309114054.GJ6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h |   14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
@@ -29,16 +29,16 @@ do {					\
  * @nr: the bit to set
  * @addr: the address to start counting from
  *
- * This operation is like clear_bit_unlock, however it is not atomic.
- * It does provide release barrier semantics so it can be used to unlock
- * a bit lock, however it would only be used if no other CPU can modify
- * any bits in the memory until the lock is released (a good example is
- * if the bit lock itself protects access to the other bits in the word).
+ * A weaker form of clear_bit_unlock() as used by __bit_lock_unlock(). If all
+ * the bits in the word are protected by this lock some archs can use weaker
+ * ops to safely unlock.
+ *
+ * See for example x86's implementation.
  */
 #define __clear_bit_unlock(nr, addr)	\
 do {					\
-	smp_mb();			\
-	__clear_bit(nr, addr);		\
+	smp_mb__before_atomic();	\
+	clear_bit(nr, addr);		\
 } while (0)
 
 #endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_LOCK_H_ */


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from peterz@infradead.org are

queue-3.14/bitops-do-not-default-to-__clear_bit-for-__clear_bit_unlock.patch
queue-3.14/x86-iopl-fix-iopl-capability-check-on-xen-pv.patch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2016-04-10 18:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-10 18:00 Patch "bitops: Do not default to __clear_bit() for __clear_bit_unlock()" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree gregkh

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.