All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] coccinelle: bool if (foo) return true; else return false;
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:25:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461137134.1917.48.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57172D78.707@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 09:19 +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 09:15 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > There's ~150 of these in the kernel.
> > > 
> > > Maybe there's use for this conversion to be added
> > > to scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolreturn.cocci or in
> > > a separate file.
> > > 
> > > $ cat booltruefalse.cocci
> > > @@
> > > identifier fn;
> > > expression e;
> > > typedef bool;
> > > symbol true;
> > > symbol false;
> > > @@
> > > 
> > > bool fn ( ... )
> > > {
> > > <...
> > > -	if (e) return true; else return false;
> > > +	return e;
> Shouldn't that be:
> ????return !!e
> ?

No, it's not necessary.
The compiler does that because the return type is bool

6.3.1.2 Boolean type

When any scalar value is converted to _Bool, the result is 0 if the value compares equal
to 0; otherwise, the result is 1.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani@redhat.com>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: cocci <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] coccinelle: bool if (foo) return true; else return false;
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:25:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461137134.1917.48.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57172D78.707@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 09:19 +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 09:15 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > There's ~150 of these in the kernel.
> > > 
> > > Maybe there's use for this conversion to be added
> > > to scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolreturn.cocci or in
> > > a separate file.
> > > 
> > > $ cat booltruefalse.cocci
> > > @@
> > > identifier fn;
> > > expression e;
> > > typedef bool;
> > > symbol true;
> > > symbol false;
> > > @@
> > > 
> > > bool fn ( ... )
> > > {
> > > <...
> > > -	if (e) return true; else return false;
> > > +	return e;
> Shouldn't that be:
>     return !!e
> ?

No, it's not necessary.
The compiler does that because the return type is bool

6.3.1.2 Boolean type

When any scalar value is converted to _Bool, the result is 0 if the value compares equal
to 0; otherwise, the result is 1.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-20  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-16 17:34 [PATCH -next] kernel: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ/WRITE_ONCE Davidlohr Bueso
2016-04-16 19:04 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Whine about ACCESS_ONCE Joe Perches
2016-04-16 19:48   ` Joe Perches
2016-04-17  5:43     ` Julia Lawall
2016-04-17  8:27       ` Joe Perches
2016-04-17 11:17         ` Julia Lawall
2016-04-17 11:39         ` Julia Lawall
2016-04-17 16:02           ` Joe Perches
     [not found]             ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1604171944500.2004@localhost6.localdomain6>
     [not found]               ` <1460915801.19090.100.camel@perches.com>
     [not found]                 ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1604172001410.2004@localhost6.localdomain6>
2016-04-19 19:12                   ` [Cocci] coccinelle: bool if (foo) return true; else return false; Joe Perches
2016-04-19 19:12                     ` Joe Perches
2016-04-19 19:15                     ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2016-04-19 19:15                       ` Julia Lawall
2016-04-20  7:19                       ` [Cocci] " Michael Stefaniuc
2016-04-20  7:19                         ` Michael Stefaniuc
2016-04-20  7:25                         ` Joe Perches [this message]
2016-04-20  7:25                           ` Joe Perches
2016-04-17 17:26   ` [PATCH V2] checkpatch: Whine about ACCESS_ONCE Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1461137134.1917.48.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.