* [PATCH] drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power well request
@ 2016-04-19 10:00 Imre Deak
2016-04-19 10:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-04-21 8:12 ` [PATCH] " Patrik Jakobsson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2016-04-19 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
In commit 5f304c873634 ("drm/i915/kbl: Reset secondary power well requests
left on by DMC/KVMR") I forgot about the fact that SKL==KBL most of the
time and that a secondary MISC IO power well request left on by the DMC is
"expected". Tune down the corresponding WARN to be a debug message. This
was caught by CI suspend tests.
CC: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
index 0ed3ec8..56df7ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
@@ -635,7 +635,8 @@ gen9_sanitize_power_well_requests(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
* other request bits to be set, so WARN for those.
*/
if (power_well_id == SKL_DISP_PW_1 ||
- (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && power_well_id == SKL_DISP_PW_MISC_IO))
+ ((IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)) &&
+ power_well_id == SKL_DISP_PW_MISC_IO))
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Clearing auxiliary requests for %s forced on "
"by DMC\n", power_well->name);
else
--
2.5.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power well request
2016-04-19 10:00 [PATCH] drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power well request Imre Deak
@ 2016-04-19 10:56 ` Patchwork
2016-04-19 12:38 ` Imre Deak
2016-04-21 8:12 ` [PATCH] " Patrik Jakobsson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-04-19 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Imre Deak; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power well request
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/5917/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Series 5917v1 drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power well request
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/5917/revisions/1/mbox/
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i7k-2)
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
pass -> FAIL (hsw-brixbox)
pass -> FAIL (byt-nuc)
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
fail -> PASS (ivb-t430s)
bdw-nuci7 total:192 pass:180 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12
bdw-ultra total:127 pass:105 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
byt-nuc total:191 pass:152 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:38
hsw-brixbox total:192 pass:167 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:24
hsw-gt2 total:192 pass:173 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
ivb-t430s total:192 pass:164 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
skl-i7k-2 total:192 pass:166 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:25
skl-nuci5 total:192 pass:181 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:11
snb-dellxps total:192 pass:154 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38
snb-x220t total:192 pass:154 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:37
BOOT FAILED for bsw-nuc-2
Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1938/
c438a31de88e7dc6bfe17ed0e094f9a1b08bcb94 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-04m-19d-09h-36m-00s UTC integration manifest
a0ddc6e drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power well request
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power well request
2016-04-19 10:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
@ 2016-04-19 12:38 ` Imre Deak
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2016-04-19 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
On ti, 2016-04-19 at 10:56 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power
> well request
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/5917/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 5917v1 drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO
> power well request
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/5917/revisions/1/mbox
> /
>
> Test kms_flip:
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
> pass -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i7k-2)
Pre-existing issue: set CRTC IOCTL->intel_atomic_commit() followed by
vlank wait timeout and "Removing stuck page" WARN:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94572
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
> pass -> FAIL (hsw-brixbox)
Pre-existing:
(kms_flip:6669) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_state, file kms_flip.c:692:
(kms_flip:6669) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: fabs((((double) diff.tv_usec) - usec_interflip) / usec_interflip) <= 0.005
(kms_flip:6669) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
(kms_flip:6669) CRITICAL: inter-vblank ts jitter: 0s, 183345usec
> pass -> FAIL (byt-nuc)
Pre-existing:
(kms_flip:7293) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_state, file kms_flip.c:692:
(kms_flip:7293) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: fabs((((double) diff.tv_usec) - usec_interflip) / usec_interflip) <= 0.005
(kms_flip:7293) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
(kms_flip:7293) CRITICAL: inter-vblank ts jitter: 0s, 183237usec
Subtest basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank failed.
> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
> fail -> PASS (ivb-t430s)
>
> bdw-
> nuci7 total:192 pass:180 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:1
> 2
> bdw-
> ultra total:127 pass:105 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:2
> 2
> byt-
> nuc total:191 pass:152 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:3
> 8
> hsw-
> brixbox total:192 pass:167 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:2
> 4
> hsw-
> gt2 total:192 pass:173 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:1
> 9
> ivb-
> t430s total:192 pass:164 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:2
> 8
> skl-i7k-
> 2 total:192 pass:166 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:25
> skl-
> nuci5 total:192 pass:181 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:1
> 1
> snb-
> dellxps total:192 pass:154 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:3
> 8
> snb-
> x220t total:192 pass:154 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:3
> 7
> BOOT FAILED for bsw-nuc-2
>
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1938/
>
> c438a31de88e7dc6bfe17ed0e094f9a1b08bcb94 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-
> 04m-19d-09h-36m-00s UTC integration manifest
> a0ddc6e drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power
> well request
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power well request
2016-04-19 10:00 [PATCH] drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power well request Imre Deak
2016-04-19 10:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
@ 2016-04-21 8:12 ` Patrik Jakobsson
2016-04-21 16:42 ` Imre Deak
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patrik Jakobsson @ 2016-04-21 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Imre Deak; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:00:36PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> In commit 5f304c873634 ("drm/i915/kbl: Reset secondary power well requests
> left on by DMC/KVMR") I forgot about the fact that SKL==KBL most of the
> time and that a secondary MISC IO power well request left on by the DMC is
> "expected". Tune down the corresponding WARN to be a debug message. This
> was caught by CI suspend tests.
>
> CC: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Was just about to bug you about this. You're one step ahead of me :)
Reviewed-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 0ed3ec8..56df7ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -635,7 +635,8 @@ gen9_sanitize_power_well_requests(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> * other request bits to be set, so WARN for those.
> */
> if (power_well_id == SKL_DISP_PW_1 ||
> - (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && power_well_id == SKL_DISP_PW_MISC_IO))
> + ((IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)) &&
> + power_well_id == SKL_DISP_PW_MISC_IO))
> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Clearing auxiliary requests for %s forced on "
> "by DMC\n", power_well->name);
> else
> --
> 2.5.0
>
--
Intel Sweden AB Registered Office: Knarrarnasgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden Registration Number: 556189-6027
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power well request
2016-04-21 8:12 ` [PATCH] " Patrik Jakobsson
@ 2016-04-21 16:42 ` Imre Deak
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2016-04-21 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrik Jakobsson; +Cc: intel-gfx
On to, 2016-04-21 at 10:12 +0200, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:00:36PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > In commit 5f304c873634 ("drm/i915/kbl: Reset secondary power well
> > requests
> > left on by DMC/KVMR") I forgot about the fact that SKL==KBL most of
> > the
> > time and that a secondary MISC IO power well request left on by the
> > DMC is
> > "expected". Tune down the corresponding WARN to be a debug message.
> > This
> > was caught by CI suspend tests.
> >
> > CC: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>
> Was just about to bug you about this. You're one step ahead of me :)
>
> Reviewed-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Thanks for the review, I pushed it to -dinq.
Yes, CI caught it for me. It would've been a clear case of reject for
the SKL patch, but KBL errors don't show up in PW/CI results yet, I
guess because it's still preliminary HW.
--Imre
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > index 0ed3ec8..56df7ff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > @@ -635,7 +635,8 @@ gen9_sanitize_power_well_requests(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > * other request bits to be set, so WARN for those.
> > */
> > if (power_well_id == SKL_DISP_PW_1 ||
> > - (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && power_well_id ==
> > SKL_DISP_PW_MISC_IO))
> > + ((IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)) &&
> > + power_well_id == SKL_DISP_PW_MISC_IO))
> > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Clearing auxiliary requests for
> > %s forced on "
> > "by DMC\n", power_well->name);
> > else
> > --
> > 2.5.0
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-21 16:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-19 10:00 [PATCH] drm/i915/kbl: Don't WARN for expected secondary MISC IO power well request Imre Deak
2016-04-19 10:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-04-19 12:38 ` Imre Deak
2016-04-21 8:12 ` [PATCH] " Patrik Jakobsson
2016-04-21 16:42 ` Imre Deak
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.