Removing builds of meta-fsl-* from the autobuilder

Removing builds of meta-fsl-* from the autobuilder

[Richard Purdie]

NXP has decided to lower its contributions to the support of the
project and is no longer eligible for the level of automated testing
we've been making of meta-fsl-ppc and meta-fsl-arm. As such we're going
to disable those builds going forward.

I don't like doing that but equally this does put a considerable load
on the infrastructure and the people running the builds and triaging
bugs and this is what we warned would have to happen.

Beth: Could you make the necessary changes please?

Richard

Re: Removing builds of meta-fsl-* from the autobuilder

[Flanagan, Elizabeth]

On 29 April 2016 at 09:44, Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> NXP has decided to lower its contributions to the support of the
> project and is no longer eligible for the level of automated testing
> we've been making of meta-fsl-ppc and meta-fsl-arm. As such we're going
> to disable those builds going forward.
>
> I don't like doing that but equally this does put a considerable load
> on the infrastructure and the people running the builds and triaging
> bugs and this is what we warned would have to happen.
>
> Beth: Could you make the necessary changes please?
>

See: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-autobuilder/commit/?id=18640b215ecfd6b604291ef4dfdbc06f8d0aa672

When the current production run is complete, I'll update the
production AB to remove

-b

> Richard



-- 
Elizabeth Flanagan
Yocto Project
Build and Release

Re: Removing builds of meta-fsl-* from the autobuilder

[Khem Raj]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1008 bytes --]


> On Apr 29, 2016, at 1:44 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> NXP has decided to lower its contributions to the support of the
> project and is no longer eligible for the level of automated testing
> we've been making of meta-fsl-ppc and meta-fsl-arm. As such we're going
> to disable those builds going forward.

I think that will ease out the pressure on system quite a bit
and testing toolchain changes will become a bit easier for me :)

Do we want to consider adding some popular community board BSP layers

> 
> I don't like doing that but equally this does put a considerable load
> on the infrastructure and the people running the builds and triaging
> bugs and this is what we warned would have to happen.

agreed.

> 
> Beth: Could you make the necessary changes please?
> 
> Richard
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]

Re: [yocto] Removing builds of meta-fsl-* from the autobuilder

[Khem Raj]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1008 bytes --]


> On Apr 29, 2016, at 1:44 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> NXP has decided to lower its contributions to the support of the
> project and is no longer eligible for the level of automated testing
> we've been making of meta-fsl-ppc and meta-fsl-arm. As such we're going
> to disable those builds going forward.

I think that will ease out the pressure on system quite a bit
and testing toolchain changes will become a bit easier for me :)

Do we want to consider adding some popular community board BSP layers

> 
> I don't like doing that but equally this does put a considerable load
> on the infrastructure and the people running the builds and triaging
> bugs and this is what we warned would have to happen.

agreed.

> 
> Beth: Could you make the necessary changes please?
> 
> Richard
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]