From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Alex Tomas <bzzz@tmi.comex.ru>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>,
David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>,
Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, Till Immanuel Patzschke <tip@inw.de>,
lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?!
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:24:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14620000.1040311472@titus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3u1hapa51.fsf@lexa.home.net>
> WLI> As userspace solutions go your suggestions is just as good. The
> WLI> kernel still needs to get its act together and with some
> WLI> urgency.
>
> what about retreiving info from /proc/kmem or something like? just to
> avoid binary -> text(proc) -> binary
The binary <-> text translation problem is less of an issue than all the
syscall traffic, dcache hits, etc. Search linux-kernel archives for a
recent thread entitiled "ps performance sucks" or something similar.
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-19 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-19 0:46 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Till Immanuel Patzschke
2002-12-19 0:47 ` [Lse-tech] " Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-19 0:53 ` Till Immanuel Patzschke
2002-12-19 1:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:12 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 1:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:20 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 1:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:42 ` Robert Love
2002-12-19 1:44 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 2:05 ` [Lse-tech] " William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 15:05 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-19 10:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 10:37 ` Alex Tomas
2002-12-19 10:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 15:24 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-12-19 15:15 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-19 1:24 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 0:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-19 1:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 14:59 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14620000.1040311472@titus \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=bzzz@tmi.comex.ru \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=tip@inw.de \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.