All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:31:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463614306.2713.101.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UexDWi0axSiR7GWz5jz91oLbjqqz7zPNWL+jyPf4bfLew@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 16:19 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Jeff Kirsher
> <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:44 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> This patch series is meant to be applied after:
> >> [PATCH v7 net-next 00/16] ipv6: Enable GUEoIPv6 and more fixes for v6
> >> tunneling
> >>
> >> The first patch addresses an issue we already resolved in the GREv4
> and
> >> is
> >> now present in GREv6 with the introduction of FOU/GUE for IPv6 based
> GRE
> >> tunnels.
> >>
> >> The second patch goes through and enables IPv6 tunnel offloads for the
> >> Intel
> >> NICs that already support the IPv4 based IP-in-IP tunnel offloads.? I
> >> have
> >> only done a bit of touch testing but have seen ~20 Gb/s over an i40e
> >> interface using a v4-in-v6 tunnel, and I have verified IPv6 GRE is
> still
> >> passing traffic at around the same rate.? I plan to do further testing
> >> but
> >> with these patches present it should enable a wider audience to be
> able
> >> to
> >> test the new features introduced in Tom's patchset with hardware
> >> offloads.
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Alexander Duyck (2):
> >>?????? ip6_gre: Do not allow segmentation offloads GRE_CSUM is enabled
> >> with FOU/GUE
> >>?????? intel: Add support for IPv6 IP-in-IP offload
> >
> > Dave, I have this series added to my queue.
> 
> Jeff,
> 
> If Tom's patches make it in for 4.7, then I would like to see if we
> could push these patches for "net" since essentially the first patch
> is a fix for Tom's earlier patches and the second is needed in order
> to really be able to test Tom's patches with a driver that actually
> supports a hardware offload.

Yeah, I was thinking that very same thing. ?I will wait to see if Dave
sucks this into 4.7 or not and plan accordingly. ?I also figured out that
your two patch series needs to have Tom's series applied before hand, so I
will be adding Tom's series to my tree just for testing purposes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20160518/2882efc7/attachment.asc>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <aduyck@mirantis.com>,
	Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>,
	intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:31:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463614306.2713.101.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UexDWi0axSiR7GWz5jz91oLbjqqz7zPNWL+jyPf4bfLew@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2049 bytes --]

On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 16:19 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Jeff Kirsher
> <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:44 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> This patch series is meant to be applied after:
> >> [PATCH v7 net-next 00/16] ipv6: Enable GUEoIPv6 and more fixes for v6
> >> tunneling
> >>
> >> The first patch addresses an issue we already resolved in the GREv4
> and
> >> is
> >> now present in GREv6 with the introduction of FOU/GUE for IPv6 based
> GRE
> >> tunnels.
> >>
> >> The second patch goes through and enables IPv6 tunnel offloads for the
> >> Intel
> >> NICs that already support the IPv4 based IP-in-IP tunnel offloads.  I
> >> have
> >> only done a bit of touch testing but have seen ~20 Gb/s over an i40e
> >> interface using a v4-in-v6 tunnel, and I have verified IPv6 GRE is
> still
> >> passing traffic at around the same rate.  I plan to do further testing
> >> but
> >> with these patches present it should enable a wider audience to be
> able
> >> to
> >> test the new features introduced in Tom's patchset with hardware
> >> offloads.
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Alexander Duyck (2):
> >>       ip6_gre: Do not allow segmentation offloads GRE_CSUM is enabled
> >> with FOU/GUE
> >>       intel: Add support for IPv6 IP-in-IP offload
> >
> > Dave, I have this series added to my queue.
> 
> Jeff,
> 
> If Tom's patches make it in for 4.7, then I would like to see if we
> could push these patches for "net" since essentially the first patch
> is a fix for Tom's earlier patches and the second is needed in order
> to really be able to test Tom's patches with a driver that actually
> supports a hardware offload.

Yeah, I was thinking that very same thing.  I will wait to see if Dave
sucks this into 4.7 or not and plan accordingly.  I also figured out that
your two patch series needs to have Tom's series applied before hand, so I
will be adding Tom's series to my tree just for testing purposes.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-18 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-18 17:44 [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 17:44 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 17:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 1/2] ip6_gre: Do not allow segmentation offloads GRE_CSUM is enabled with FOU/GUE Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 17:44   ` Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 17:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 2/2] intel: Add support for IPv6 IP-in-IP offload Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 17:44   ` Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 21:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches Jeff Kirsher
2016-05-18 21:27   ` Jeff Kirsher
2016-05-18 23:19   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 23:19     ` Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 23:31     ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2016-05-18 23:31       ` Jeff Kirsher
2016-05-19  4:10   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Miller
2016-05-19  4:10     ` David Miller
2016-05-24 17:14     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jeff Kirsher
2016-05-24 17:14       ` Jeff Kirsher
2016-05-24 17:46       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alex Duyck
2016-05-24 17:46         ` Alex Duyck
2016-05-20 23:26 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Miller
2016-05-20 23:26   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1463614306.2713.101.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.