From: weiqing kong <weiqing.kong-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Ian Campbell
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-pwm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
srv_heupstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
Sascha Hauer <kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
erin.lo-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
yingjoe.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
eddie.huang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
yh.huang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
yt.shen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:21:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1465370478.5209.30.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5751A3DD.7020402-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 17:35 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 30/05/16 10:41, Weiqing Kong wrote:
> > Use the mtk_pwm_data struction to define different registers
> > and add MT2701 specific register operations, such as MT2701
> > doesn't have commit register, needs to disable double buffer
> > before writing register, and needs to select manual mode
> > and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Weiqing Kong <weiqing.kong-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > index 0ad3385..03b9c9e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > @@ -18,33 +18,44 @@
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/pwm.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> > #define DISP_PWM_EN 0x00
> > -#define PWM_ENABLE_MASK BIT(0)
> >
> > #define DISP_PWM_COMMIT 0x08
> > #define PWM_COMMIT_MASK BIT(0)
> >
> > -#define DISP_PWM_CON_0 0x10
> > #define PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT 16
> > #define PWM_CLKDIV_MAX 0x3ff
> > #define PWM_CLKDIV_MASK (PWM_CLKDIV_MAX << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT)
> >
> > -#define DISP_PWM_CON_1 0x14
> > #define PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH 12
> > #define PWM_PERIOD_MASK ((1 << PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH) - 1)
> >
> > #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT 16
> > #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK (0x1fff << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT)
> >
> > +#define MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK BIT(1)
> > +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG 0xb0
>
> Do we need to set magic 0x3 in the debug register? If so, this should be
> part of mtk_pwm_data, just as con0_sel.
Do you mean that add bls_debug into struct mtk_pwm_data,
and set 0x3 in mt2701 data, 0x0 in mt8173 data?
>
> > +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK 0x3
> > +
> > +struct mtk_pwm_data {
> > + unsigned int enable_bit;
> > + unsigned int con0;
> > + unsigned int con0_sel;
> > + unsigned int con1;
> > + bool have_commit_reg;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct mtk_disp_pwm {
> > struct pwm_chip chip;
> > struct clk *clk_main;
> > struct clk *clk_mm;
> > void __iomem *base;
> > + const struct mtk_pwm_data *data;
>
> Couldn't that just be the offset for the commit register and set it to
> 0x0 if the commit register is not present. Right now, we suppose the
> DISP_PWM_EN is at offset 0x0, so this should not be a problem.
>
Do you mean that replace have_commit_reg with commit_reg_offset?
just like this?
bool have_commit_reg;
->
unsigned int commit_reg_offset;
and set commit_reg_offset 0x0 in mt2701, 0x1 in mt8173?
> > };
> >
> > static inline struct mtk_disp_pwm *to_mtk_disp_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> > @@ -106,12 +117,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_0, PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > + PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> > clk_div << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT);
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_1,
> > - PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK, value);
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 1);
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con1,
> > + PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK,
> > + value);
> > + if (mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
> > + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x1);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
> > + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x0);
>
> should be renamed to MT8173_PWM_COMMIT_MASK, although I'm not really a
> friend of mixing up SoC specific defines with a Soc specific
> mtk_disp_pwm structure.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
ok, I will modify it as you said. thanks for you suggestion.
>
> > + }
> >
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
> > @@ -134,7 +151,9 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 1);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
> > + mdp->data->enable_bit,
> > + mdp->data->enable_bit);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -143,7 +162,8 @@ static void mtk_disp_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > {
> > struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp = to_mtk_disp_pwm(chip);
> >
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 0);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
> > + mdp->data->enable_bit, 0x0);
> >
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
> > @@ -156,12 +176,41 @@ static const struct pwm_ops mtk_disp_pwm_ops = {
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt8173_pwm_data = {
> > + .enable_bit = BIT(0),
> > + .con0 = 0x10,
> > + .con0_sel = 0x0,
> > + .con1 = 0x14,
> > + .have_commit_reg = true,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt2701_pwm_data = {
> > + .enable_bit = BIT(16),
> > + .con0 = 0xa8,
> > + .con0_sel = 0x2,
> > + .con1 = 0xac,
> > + .have_commit_reg = false,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-bls", .data = &mt2701_pwm_data},
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
> > + { }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
> > +
> > static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > + const struct of_device_id *id;
> > struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp;
> > struct resource *r;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + id = of_match_device(mtk_disp_pwm_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> > + if (!id)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > mdp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mdp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!mdp)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -191,6 +240,7 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > mdp->chip.ops = &mtk_disp_pwm_ops;
> > mdp->chip.base = -1;
> > mdp->chip.npwm = 1;
> > + mdp->data = id->data;
> >
> > ret = pwmchip_add(&mdp->chip);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > @@ -200,6 +250,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mdp);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register
> > + * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> > + */
> > + if (!mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG,
> > + MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK, 0x3);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > + MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK,
> > + mdp->data->con0_sel);
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> >
> > disable_clk_mm:
> > @@ -221,13 +283,6 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm" },
> > - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm" },
> > - { }
> > -};
> > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
> > -
> > static struct platform_driver mtk_disp_pwm_driver = {
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "mediatek-disp-pwm",
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: weiqing.kong@mediatek.com (weiqing kong)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:21:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1465370478.5209.30.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5751A3DD.7020402@gmail.com>
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 17:35 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 30/05/16 10:41, Weiqing Kong wrote:
> > Use the mtk_pwm_data struction to define different registers
> > and add MT2701 specific register operations, such as MT2701
> > doesn't have commit register, needs to disable double buffer
> > before writing register, and needs to select manual mode
> > and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Weiqing Kong <weiqing.kong@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > index 0ad3385..03b9c9e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > @@ -18,33 +18,44 @@
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/pwm.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> > #define DISP_PWM_EN 0x00
> > -#define PWM_ENABLE_MASK BIT(0)
> >
> > #define DISP_PWM_COMMIT 0x08
> > #define PWM_COMMIT_MASK BIT(0)
> >
> > -#define DISP_PWM_CON_0 0x10
> > #define PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT 16
> > #define PWM_CLKDIV_MAX 0x3ff
> > #define PWM_CLKDIV_MASK (PWM_CLKDIV_MAX << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT)
> >
> > -#define DISP_PWM_CON_1 0x14
> > #define PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH 12
> > #define PWM_PERIOD_MASK ((1 << PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH) - 1)
> >
> > #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT 16
> > #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK (0x1fff << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT)
> >
> > +#define MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK BIT(1)
> > +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG 0xb0
>
> Do we need to set magic 0x3 in the debug register? If so, this should be
> part of mtk_pwm_data, just as con0_sel.
Do you mean that add bls_debug into struct mtk_pwm_data,
and set 0x3 in mt2701 data, 0x0 in mt8173 data?
>
> > +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK 0x3
> > +
> > +struct mtk_pwm_data {
> > + unsigned int enable_bit;
> > + unsigned int con0;
> > + unsigned int con0_sel;
> > + unsigned int con1;
> > + bool have_commit_reg;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct mtk_disp_pwm {
> > struct pwm_chip chip;
> > struct clk *clk_main;
> > struct clk *clk_mm;
> > void __iomem *base;
> > + const struct mtk_pwm_data *data;
>
> Couldn't that just be the offset for the commit register and set it to
> 0x0 if the commit register is not present. Right now, we suppose the
> DISP_PWM_EN is at offset 0x0, so this should not be a problem.
>
Do you mean that replace have_commit_reg with commit_reg_offset?
just like this?
bool have_commit_reg;
->
unsigned int commit_reg_offset;
and set commit_reg_offset 0x0 in mt2701, 0x1 in mt8173?
> > };
> >
> > static inline struct mtk_disp_pwm *to_mtk_disp_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> > @@ -106,12 +117,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_0, PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > + PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> > clk_div << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT);
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_1,
> > - PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK, value);
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 1);
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con1,
> > + PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK,
> > + value);
> > + if (mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
> > + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x1);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
> > + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x0);
>
> should be renamed to MT8173_PWM_COMMIT_MASK, although I'm not really a
> friend of mixing up SoC specific defines with a Soc specific
> mtk_disp_pwm structure.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
ok, I will modify it as you said. thanks for you suggestion.
>
> > + }
> >
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
> > @@ -134,7 +151,9 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 1);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
> > + mdp->data->enable_bit,
> > + mdp->data->enable_bit);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -143,7 +162,8 @@ static void mtk_disp_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > {
> > struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp = to_mtk_disp_pwm(chip);
> >
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 0);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
> > + mdp->data->enable_bit, 0x0);
> >
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
> > @@ -156,12 +176,41 @@ static const struct pwm_ops mtk_disp_pwm_ops = {
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt8173_pwm_data = {
> > + .enable_bit = BIT(0),
> > + .con0 = 0x10,
> > + .con0_sel = 0x0,
> > + .con1 = 0x14,
> > + .have_commit_reg = true,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt2701_pwm_data = {
> > + .enable_bit = BIT(16),
> > + .con0 = 0xa8,
> > + .con0_sel = 0x2,
> > + .con1 = 0xac,
> > + .have_commit_reg = false,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-bls", .data = &mt2701_pwm_data},
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
> > + { }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
> > +
> > static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > + const struct of_device_id *id;
> > struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp;
> > struct resource *r;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + id = of_match_device(mtk_disp_pwm_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> > + if (!id)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > mdp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mdp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!mdp)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -191,6 +240,7 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > mdp->chip.ops = &mtk_disp_pwm_ops;
> > mdp->chip.base = -1;
> > mdp->chip.npwm = 1;
> > + mdp->data = id->data;
> >
> > ret = pwmchip_add(&mdp->chip);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > @@ -200,6 +250,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mdp);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register
> > + * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> > + */
> > + if (!mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG,
> > + MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK, 0x3);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > + MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK,
> > + mdp->data->con0_sel);
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> >
> > disable_clk_mm:
> > @@ -221,13 +283,6 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm" },
> > - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm" },
> > - { }
> > -};
> > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
> > -
> > static struct platform_driver mtk_disp_pwm_driver = {
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "mediatek-disp-pwm",
> >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: weiqing kong <weiqing.kong@mediatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
<linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>, <erin.lo@mediatek.com>,
<yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>, <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
<yh.huang@mediatek.com>, <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:21:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1465370478.5209.30.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5751A3DD.7020402@gmail.com>
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 17:35 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 30/05/16 10:41, Weiqing Kong wrote:
> > Use the mtk_pwm_data struction to define different registers
> > and add MT2701 specific register operations, such as MT2701
> > doesn't have commit register, needs to disable double buffer
> > before writing register, and needs to select manual mode
> > and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Weiqing Kong <weiqing.kong@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > index 0ad3385..03b9c9e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > @@ -18,33 +18,44 @@
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/pwm.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> > #define DISP_PWM_EN 0x00
> > -#define PWM_ENABLE_MASK BIT(0)
> >
> > #define DISP_PWM_COMMIT 0x08
> > #define PWM_COMMIT_MASK BIT(0)
> >
> > -#define DISP_PWM_CON_0 0x10
> > #define PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT 16
> > #define PWM_CLKDIV_MAX 0x3ff
> > #define PWM_CLKDIV_MASK (PWM_CLKDIV_MAX << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT)
> >
> > -#define DISP_PWM_CON_1 0x14
> > #define PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH 12
> > #define PWM_PERIOD_MASK ((1 << PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH) - 1)
> >
> > #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT 16
> > #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK (0x1fff << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT)
> >
> > +#define MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK BIT(1)
> > +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG 0xb0
>
> Do we need to set magic 0x3 in the debug register? If so, this should be
> part of mtk_pwm_data, just as con0_sel.
Do you mean that add bls_debug into struct mtk_pwm_data,
and set 0x3 in mt2701 data, 0x0 in mt8173 data?
>
> > +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK 0x3
> > +
> > +struct mtk_pwm_data {
> > + unsigned int enable_bit;
> > + unsigned int con0;
> > + unsigned int con0_sel;
> > + unsigned int con1;
> > + bool have_commit_reg;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct mtk_disp_pwm {
> > struct pwm_chip chip;
> > struct clk *clk_main;
> > struct clk *clk_mm;
> > void __iomem *base;
> > + const struct mtk_pwm_data *data;
>
> Couldn't that just be the offset for the commit register and set it to
> 0x0 if the commit register is not present. Right now, we suppose the
> DISP_PWM_EN is at offset 0x0, so this should not be a problem.
>
Do you mean that replace have_commit_reg with commit_reg_offset?
just like this?
bool have_commit_reg;
->
unsigned int commit_reg_offset;
and set commit_reg_offset 0x0 in mt2701, 0x1 in mt8173?
> > };
> >
> > static inline struct mtk_disp_pwm *to_mtk_disp_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> > @@ -106,12 +117,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_0, PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > + PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> > clk_div << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT);
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_1,
> > - PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK, value);
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 1);
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con1,
> > + PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK,
> > + value);
> > + if (mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
> > + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x1);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
> > + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x0);
>
> should be renamed to MT8173_PWM_COMMIT_MASK, although I'm not really a
> friend of mixing up SoC specific defines with a Soc specific
> mtk_disp_pwm structure.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
ok, I will modify it as you said. thanks for you suggestion.
>
> > + }
> >
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
> > @@ -134,7 +151,9 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 1);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
> > + mdp->data->enable_bit,
> > + mdp->data->enable_bit);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -143,7 +162,8 @@ static void mtk_disp_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > {
> > struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp = to_mtk_disp_pwm(chip);
> >
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 0);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
> > + mdp->data->enable_bit, 0x0);
> >
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
> > @@ -156,12 +176,41 @@ static const struct pwm_ops mtk_disp_pwm_ops = {
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt8173_pwm_data = {
> > + .enable_bit = BIT(0),
> > + .con0 = 0x10,
> > + .con0_sel = 0x0,
> > + .con1 = 0x14,
> > + .have_commit_reg = true,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt2701_pwm_data = {
> > + .enable_bit = BIT(16),
> > + .con0 = 0xa8,
> > + .con0_sel = 0x2,
> > + .con1 = 0xac,
> > + .have_commit_reg = false,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-bls", .data = &mt2701_pwm_data},
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
> > + { }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
> > +
> > static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > + const struct of_device_id *id;
> > struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp;
> > struct resource *r;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + id = of_match_device(mtk_disp_pwm_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> > + if (!id)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > mdp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mdp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!mdp)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -191,6 +240,7 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > mdp->chip.ops = &mtk_disp_pwm_ops;
> > mdp->chip.base = -1;
> > mdp->chip.npwm = 1;
> > + mdp->data = id->data;
> >
> > ret = pwmchip_add(&mdp->chip);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > @@ -200,6 +250,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mdp);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register
> > + * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> > + */
> > + if (!mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG,
> > + MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK, 0x3);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > + MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK,
> > + mdp->data->con0_sel);
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> >
> > disable_clk_mm:
> > @@ -221,13 +283,6 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm" },
> > - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm" },
> > - { }
> > -};
> > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
> > -
> > static struct platform_driver mtk_disp_pwm_driver = {
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "mediatek-disp-pwm",
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-30 8:41 [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Support Mediatek Soc MT2701 disp pwm Weiqing Kong
2016-05-30 8:41 ` Weiqing Kong
2016-05-30 8:41 ` Weiqing Kong
2016-05-30 8:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add MediaTek display PWM bindings Weiqing Kong
2016-05-30 8:41 ` Weiqing Kong
2016-05-30 8:41 ` Weiqing Kong
2016-06-02 22:45 ` Rob Herring
2016-06-02 22:45 ` Rob Herring
2016-06-03 6:45 ` weiqing kong
2016-06-03 6:45 ` weiqing kong
2016-06-03 6:45 ` weiqing kong
2016-06-03 15:03 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-06-03 15:03 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-06-08 6:48 ` weiqing kong
2016-06-08 6:48 ` weiqing kong
2016-06-08 6:48 ` weiqing kong
2016-05-30 8:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support Weiqing Kong
2016-05-30 8:41 ` Weiqing Kong
2016-05-30 8:41 ` Weiqing Kong
2016-06-03 15:35 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-06-03 15:35 ` Matthias Brugger
[not found] ` <5751A3DD.7020402-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-08 7:21 ` weiqing kong [this message]
2016-06-08 7:21 ` weiqing kong
2016-06-08 7:21 ` weiqing kong
2016-06-08 11:22 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-06-08 11:22 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-06-08 11:22 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-06-08 12:05 ` weiqing kong
2016-06-08 12:05 ` weiqing kong
2016-06-08 12:05 ` weiqing kong
2016-05-30 8:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] dts: Add disp bls dsti and dts config for MT2701 Weiqing Kong
2016-05-30 8:41 ` Weiqing Kong
2016-05-30 8:41 ` Weiqing Kong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-23 11:23 [PATCH 0/3] Support Mediatek Soc MT2701 disp pwm Weiqing Kong
2016-05-23 11:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support Weiqing Kong
2016-05-23 11:23 ` Weiqing Kong
2016-05-23 6:23 [PATCH 0/3] Support Mediatek Soc MT2701 disp pwm weiqing.kong
2016-05-23 6:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support weiqing.kong
2016-05-23 6:23 ` weiqing.kong
2016-05-16 8:14 [PATCH 0/3] Support Mediatek Soc MT2701 disp pwm Weiqing Kong
2016-05-16 8:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support Weiqing Kong
2016-05-04 6:53 [PATCH 0/3] Support Mediatek Soc MT2701 disp pwm Weiqing Kong
2016-05-04 6:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support Weiqing Kong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1465370478.5209.30.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=weiqing.kong-nus5lvnupcjwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=eddie.huang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=erin.lo-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-pwm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=srv_heupstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yh.huang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yingjoe.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yt.shen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.