From: Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com (Alexey Brodkin)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx() returns -EINVAL if "memory-region" is missing
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:47:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466146013.2948.1.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b26dcbc6-758a-a08f-b258-945548aab3dc@samsung.com>
Hi Marek,
On Fri, 2016-06-17@07:28 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Alexey
>
>
> On 2016-06-16 18:47, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > We used to use of_reserved_mem_device_init() in such a context in GPU drivers:
> > -------------------->8-------------------
> > /* Get the optional framebuffer memory resource */
> > ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(drm->dev);
> > if (ret && ret != -ENODEV)
> > return ret;
> > -------------------->8-------------------
> >
> > The point is we may have a dedicated reserved memory area or may not have (depends on a particular .dts).
> > Our expectation is if reserved memory area is missing then of_reserved_mem_device_init()
> > just returns -ENODEV and it used to work like this.
> >
> > Now with your commit 59ce4039727e "of: reserved_mem: add support for using more than one region for given device"
> > behavior is different. of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx() has this:
> > -------------------->8-------------------
> > target = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", idx);
> > if (!target)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > -------------------->8-------------------
> >
> > So I'm wondering which part should be fixed:
> > ? 1) of_reserved_mem itself or
> > ? 2) users of of_reserved_mem_device_init()
> >
> > Any thoughts?
>
> This was my fault. The fix is already queued to linux-next, see commit
> 9f5a802b1d51dc80a27d828a5f7dcc8ec4a72f03 ("[media] of: reserved_mem: restore
> old behavior when no region is defined"),
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg100972.html
>
Indeed with mentioned fix GPU driver now works again!
Sorry for the noise and thank you for fixing it that fast.
Regards,
Alexey
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
To: "m.szyprowski@samsung.com" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: "robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
"s.nawrocki@samsung.com" <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
"airlied@linux.ie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Liviu.Dudau@arm.com" <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"daniel@ffwll.ch" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx() returns -EINVAL if "memory-region" is missing
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:47:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466146013.2948.1.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b26dcbc6-758a-a08f-b258-945548aab3dc@samsung.com>
Hi Marek,
On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 07:28 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Alexey
>
>
> On 2016-06-16 18:47, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > We used to use of_reserved_mem_device_init() in such a context in GPU drivers:
> > -------------------->8-------------------
> > /* Get the optional framebuffer memory resource */
> > ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(drm->dev);
> > if (ret && ret != -ENODEV)
> > return ret;
> > -------------------->8-------------------
> >
> > The point is we may have a dedicated reserved memory area or may not have (depends on a particular .dts).
> > Our expectation is if reserved memory area is missing then of_reserved_mem_device_init()
> > just returns -ENODEV and it used to work like this.
> >
> > Now with your commit 59ce4039727e "of: reserved_mem: add support for using more than one region for given device"
> > behavior is different. of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx() has this:
> > -------------------->8-------------------
> > target = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", idx);
> > if (!target)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > -------------------->8-------------------
> >
> > So I'm wondering which part should be fixed:
> > 1) of_reserved_mem itself or
> > 2) users of of_reserved_mem_device_init()
> >
> > Any thoughts?
>
> This was my fault. The fix is already queued to linux-next, see commit
> 9f5a802b1d51dc80a27d828a5f7dcc8ec4a72f03 ("[media] of: reserved_mem: restore
> old behavior when no region is defined"),
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg100972.html
>
Indeed with mentioned fix GPU driver now works again!
Sorry for the noise and thank you for fixing it that fast.
Regards,
Alexey
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-17 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-16 16:47 of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx() returns -EINVAL if "memory-region" is missing Alexey Brodkin
2016-06-16 16:47 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-06-17 5:28 ` Marek Szyprowski
2016-06-17 5:28 ` Marek Szyprowski
2016-06-17 6:47 ` Alexey Brodkin [this message]
2016-06-17 6:47 ` Alexey Brodkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1466146013.2948.1.camel@synopsys.com \
--to=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.