From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, peterz@infradead.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
boqun.feng@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com, waiman.long@hpe.com,
mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:54:14 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467802454.9143.1.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467124991-13164-3-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 10:43 -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
> kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu
^^ takes
> as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can break
> the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted.
>
> As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it.
>
> Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same
^^ support
> kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as
> powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on
^^ yield
> powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type.
>
> Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index 523673d..3ac9fcb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,24 @@
> #define SYNC_IO
> #endif
>
> +/*
> + * This support kernel to check if one cpu is preempted or not.
> + * Then we can fix some lock holder preemption issue.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES
> +#define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
> +static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> +{
> + /*
> + * pSeries and powerNV can be built into same kernel image. In
> + * principle we need return false directly if we are running as
> + * powerNV. However the yield_count is always zero on powerNV, So
> + * skip such machine type check
Or you could use the ppc_md interface callbacks if required, but your
solution works as well
> + */
> + return !!(be32_to_cpu(lppaca_of(cpu).yield_count) & 1);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static __always_inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
> {
> return lock.slock == 0;
Balbir Singh.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, peterz@infradead.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
boqun.feng@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com, waiman.long@hpe.com,
mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:54:14 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467802454.9143.1.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467124991-13164-3-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 10:43 -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
> kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu
^^ takes
> as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can break
> the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted.
>
> As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it.
>
> Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same
^^ support
> kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as
> powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on
^^ yield
> powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type.
>
> Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index 523673d..3ac9fcb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,24 @@
> #define SYNC_IO
> #endif
>
> +/*
> + * This support kernel to check if one cpu is preempted or not.
> + * Then we can fix some lock holder preemption issue.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES
> +#define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
> +static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> +{
> + /*
> + * pSeries and powerNV can be built into same kernel image. In
> + * principle we need return false directly if we are running as
> + * powerNV. However the yield_count is always zero on powerNV, So
> + * skip such machine type check
Or you could use the ppc_md interface callbacks if required, but your
solution works as well
> + */
> + return !!(be32_to_cpu(lppaca_of(cpu).yield_count) & 1);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static __always_inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
> {
> return lock.slock == 0;
Balbir Singh.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-28 14:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` Pan Xinhui
2016-07-05 9:57 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-05 9:57 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 4:58 ` xinhui
2016-07-06 4:58 ` xinhui
2016-07-06 6:46 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 6:46 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 6:46 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 7:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 7:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 8:32 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 8:32 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 10:18 ` xinhui
2016-07-06 10:18 ` xinhui
2016-07-06 10:54 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2016-07-06 10:54 ` Balbir Singh
2016-07-15 15:35 ` Pan Xinhui
2016-07-15 15:35 ` Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock() Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex, rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex, rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui
2016-07-06 6:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 6:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 7:47 ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-06 7:47 ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-06 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 8:38 ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-06 8:38 ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-06 12:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 12:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 16:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-06 16:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-06 16:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-06 10:05 ` xinhui
2016-07-06 10:05 ` xinhui
2016-07-06 10:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 12:08 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 12:08 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 13:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 13:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 8:48 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 8:48 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 10:12 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 10:12 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 10:27 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 10:27 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-11 15:10 ` Waiman Long
2016-07-11 15:10 ` Waiman Long
2016-07-11 15:10 ` Waiman Long
2016-07-12 4:16 ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-12 4:16 ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-12 18:16 ` Waiman Long
2016-07-12 18:16 ` Waiman Long
2016-07-12 18:16 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467802454.9143.1.camel@gmail.com \
--to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hpe.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.