All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	alcooperx@gmail.com
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Add ability to increase max clock rate for 72116b0
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 13:29:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <146fb86f-c66d-4c72-d953-a73271d855f4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220517180435.29940-3-kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>

Hi Kamal,

On 5/17/2022 11:04 AM, Kamal Dasu wrote:
> From: Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
> 
> The 72116B0 has improved SDIO controllers that allow the max clock
> rate to be increased from a max of 100MHz to a max of 150MHz. The
> driver will need to get the clock and increase it's default rate
> and override the caps register, that still indicates a max of 100MHz.
> The new clock will be named "sdio_freq" in the DT node's "clock-names"
> list. The driver will use a DT property, "max-frequency", to
> enable this functionality and will get the actual rate in MHz
> from the property to allow various speeds to be requested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> index 8eb57de48e0c..bb614a5e1ea4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> @@ -250,6 +250,8 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host;
>   	const struct of_device_id *match;
>   	struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *priv;
> +	struct clk *master_clk;
> +	u32 actual_clock_mhz;
>   	struct sdhci_host *host;
>   	struct resource *iomem;
>   	struct clk *clk;
> @@ -330,6 +332,32 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (match_priv->flags & BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_BROKEN_TIMEOUT)
>   		host->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_TIMEOUT_VAL;
>   
> +	/* Change the base clock frequency if the DT property exists */
> +	if (!(host->mmc->f_max))
> +		goto add_host;
> +
> +	master_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "sdio_freq");

This looks like a candidate for devm_clk_get_optional() since the clock 
is optional. Then you can call clk_prepare_enable() unconditionally even 
if it is NULL/non-existent.

> +	if (IS_ERR(master_clk)) {
> +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Clock for \"sdio_freq\" not found\n");
> +		goto add_host;
> +	} else {
> +		res = clk_prepare_enable(master_clk);
> +		if (res)
> +			goto err;

It looks like we may be leaving the clock enabled even when we did not 
want to (e.g.: error path) and do not we need to turn if off, 
respectively turn it back on in .suspend() and .resume()?

> +	}
> +
> +	/* set improved clock rate */
> +	clk_set_rate(master_clk, host->mmc->f_max);
> +	actual_clock_mhz = clk_get_rate(master_clk) / 1000000;
> +
> +	host->caps &= ~SDHCI_CLOCK_V3_BASE_MASK;
> +	host->caps |= (actual_clock_mhz << SDHCI_CLOCK_BASE_SHIFT);
> +	/* Disable presets because they are now incorrect */
> +	host->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN;
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Base Clock Frequency changed to %dMHz\n",
> +		actual_clock_mhz);
> +
> +add_host:
>   	res = sdhci_brcmstb_add_host(host, priv);
>   	if (res)
>   		goto err;

It looks like we would need to unwind the clk_prepare_enable(master_clk) 
in case of failures here.
-- 
Florian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	alcooperx@gmail.com
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Add ability to increase max clock rate for 72116b0
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 13:29:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <146fb86f-c66d-4c72-d953-a73271d855f4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220517180435.29940-3-kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>

Hi Kamal,

On 5/17/2022 11:04 AM, Kamal Dasu wrote:
> From: Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
> 
> The 72116B0 has improved SDIO controllers that allow the max clock
> rate to be increased from a max of 100MHz to a max of 150MHz. The
> driver will need to get the clock and increase it's default rate
> and override the caps register, that still indicates a max of 100MHz.
> The new clock will be named "sdio_freq" in the DT node's "clock-names"
> list. The driver will use a DT property, "max-frequency", to
> enable this functionality and will get the actual rate in MHz
> from the property to allow various speeds to be requested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> index 8eb57de48e0c..bb614a5e1ea4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> @@ -250,6 +250,8 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host;
>   	const struct of_device_id *match;
>   	struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *priv;
> +	struct clk *master_clk;
> +	u32 actual_clock_mhz;
>   	struct sdhci_host *host;
>   	struct resource *iomem;
>   	struct clk *clk;
> @@ -330,6 +332,32 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (match_priv->flags & BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_BROKEN_TIMEOUT)
>   		host->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_TIMEOUT_VAL;
>   
> +	/* Change the base clock frequency if the DT property exists */
> +	if (!(host->mmc->f_max))
> +		goto add_host;
> +
> +	master_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "sdio_freq");

This looks like a candidate for devm_clk_get_optional() since the clock 
is optional. Then you can call clk_prepare_enable() unconditionally even 
if it is NULL/non-existent.

> +	if (IS_ERR(master_clk)) {
> +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Clock for \"sdio_freq\" not found\n");
> +		goto add_host;
> +	} else {
> +		res = clk_prepare_enable(master_clk);
> +		if (res)
> +			goto err;

It looks like we may be leaving the clock enabled even when we did not 
want to (e.g.: error path) and do not we need to turn if off, 
respectively turn it back on in .suspend() and .resume()?

> +	}
> +
> +	/* set improved clock rate */
> +	clk_set_rate(master_clk, host->mmc->f_max);
> +	actual_clock_mhz = clk_get_rate(master_clk) / 1000000;
> +
> +	host->caps &= ~SDHCI_CLOCK_V3_BASE_MASK;
> +	host->caps |= (actual_clock_mhz << SDHCI_CLOCK_BASE_SHIFT);
> +	/* Disable presets because they are now incorrect */
> +	host->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN;
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Base Clock Frequency changed to %dMHz\n",
> +		actual_clock_mhz);
> +
> +add_host:
>   	res = sdhci_brcmstb_add_host(host, priv);
>   	if (res)
>   		goto err;

It looks like we would need to unwind the clk_prepare_enable(master_clk) 
in case of failures here.
-- 
Florian

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-17 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-17 18:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Add support for optional sdio_freq clock Kamal Dasu
2022-05-17 18:04 ` Kamal Dasu
2022-05-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: Add Broadcom " Kamal Dasu
2022-05-17 18:04   ` Kamal Dasu
2022-05-17 18:31   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-05-17 18:31     ` Florian Fainelli
2022-05-17 18:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Add ability to increase max clock rate for 72116b0 Kamal Dasu
2022-05-17 18:04   ` Kamal Dasu
2022-05-17 20:29   ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2022-05-17 20:29     ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=146fb86f-c66d-4c72-d953-a73271d855f4@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alcooperx@gmail.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kdasu.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.