All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1470003741.3998.140.camel@perches.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 5dbda4c..54ec788 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 00:04 +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
 > > These might be better without the automatic use of ret
 > > 
 > > 	return !gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_AC_IN) ||
-> > 	? ? ? ?!gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_KEY_INT) ||
-> > 	? ? ? ?!gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_WAKEUP);
+> > 	       !gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_KEY_INT) ||
+> > 	       !gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_WAKEUP);
 > Yeah, I thought about this when I made the patch.
 > 
 > I supposed it was written this way so that a printk was easier to add, that's
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 00:04 +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
 > I have no strong opinion about this, so if you think it's worth it I can make
 > the additional change.
 
-Hi Robert. ?Your choice.
+Hi Robert.  Your choice.
 
-It was one of those, 'oh, bother' type of things but?
+It was one of those, 'oh, bother' type of things but 
 I think it's worth it for readability and consistency.
 
 cheers, Joe
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index efbac4e..7816359 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,10 +1,15 @@
  "ref\01469967435-23436-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr\0"
  "ref\01469997882.3998.136.camel@perches.com\0"
  "ref\087shupxy50.fsf@belgarion.home\0"
- "From\0joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v3] ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts\0"
+ "From\0Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts\0"
  "Date\0Sun, 31 Jul 2016 15:22:21 -0700\0"
- "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>\0"
+ "Cc\0Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>"
+  Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
+  Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+ " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 00:04 +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:\n"
@@ -13,8 +18,8 @@
  "> > These might be better without the automatic use of ret\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> > \treturn !gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_AC_IN) ||\n"
- "> > \t? ? ? ?!gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_KEY_INT) ||\n"
- "> > \t? ? ? ?!gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_WAKEUP);\n"
+ "> > \t\302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240!gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_KEY_INT) ||\n"
+ "> > \t\302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240!gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_WAKEUP);\n"
  "> Yeah, I thought about this when I made the patch.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> I supposed it was written this way so that a printk was easier to add, that's\n"
@@ -23,11 +28,11 @@
  "> I have no strong opinion about this, so if you think it's worth it I can make\n"
  "> the additional change.\n"
  "\n"
- "Hi Robert. ?Your choice.\n"
+ "Hi Robert. \302\240Your choice.\n"
  "\n"
- "It was one of those, 'oh, bother' type of things but?\n"
+ "It was one of those, 'oh, bother' type of things but\302\240\n"
  "I think it's worth it for readability and consistency.\n"
  "\n"
  cheers, Joe
 
-4575877ae6d241986d9b24b69d71fb6b5c3f83542320e05f7ec68c80bf0ad77b
+489ff1f1bad66c10877ff2c7ebee999f3857f12b35f868bfe25f46259b5d78a2

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.