From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>, "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
OpenEmbedded Devel List
<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
Yocto Discussion Mailing List <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [RFT] binutils 2.27
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 16:24:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470756255.8166.51.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC67B803-475F-4992-8DFD-B8F5FA7B1D15@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 07:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> I could also see it on ppc. backtrace, shows the segfault is in exit
> path and happens in libc
> at this point, I think the problem is how libc is compiled with
> binutils 2.27, connman itself
> is ok.
Its the issue here:
https://sourceware.org/ml/glibc-bugs/2015-01/msg00274.html
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17908
Basically, if you remove the global _IO_stdin_used symbol, it triggers
compatibility code which crashes.
I've confirmed that if I add that symbol to the version-script in
connman, things work again.
Any idea how we raise the priority of this issue. There are no comments
on the bug despite it having been posted a while ago :(.
Cheers,
Richard
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>, "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
OpenEmbedded Devel List
<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
Yocto Discussion Mailing List <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT] binutils 2.27
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 16:24:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470756255.8166.51.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC67B803-475F-4992-8DFD-B8F5FA7B1D15@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 07:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> I could also see it on ppc. backtrace, shows the segfault is in exit
> path and happens in libc
> at this point, I think the problem is how libc is compiled with
> binutils 2.27, connman itself
> is ok.
Its the issue here:
https://sourceware.org/ml/glibc-bugs/2015-01/msg00274.html
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17908
Basically, if you remove the global _IO_stdin_used symbol, it triggers
compatibility code which crashes.
I've confirmed that if I add that symbol to the version-script in
connman, things work again.
Any idea how we raise the priority of this issue. There are no comments
on the bug despite it having been posted a while ago :(.
Cheers,
Richard
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>, "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: "André Draszik" <git@andred.net>,
OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
"OpenEmbedded Devel List"
<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
"Yocto Discussion Mailing List" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [RFT] binutils 2.27
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 16:24:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470756255.8166.51.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC67B803-475F-4992-8DFD-B8F5FA7B1D15@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 07:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> I could also see it on ppc. backtrace, shows the segfault is in exit
> path and happens in libc
> at this point, I think the problem is how libc is compiled with
> binutils 2.27, connman itself
> is ok.
Its the issue here:
https://sourceware.org/ml/glibc-bugs/2015-01/msg00274.html
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17908
Basically, if you remove the global _IO_stdin_used symbol, it triggers
compatibility code which crashes.
I've confirmed that if I add that symbol to the version-script in
connman, things work again.
Any idea how we raise the priority of this issue. There are no comments
on the bug despite it having been posted a while ago :(.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-09 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-07 8:39 [RFT] binutils 2.27 Khem Raj
2016-08-08 6:28 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2016-08-08 6:28 ` Richard Purdie
2016-08-08 7:24 ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
2016-08-08 7:24 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-08 8:14 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2016-08-08 8:14 ` Richard Purdie
2016-08-08 8:50 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2016-08-08 8:50 ` Richard Purdie
2016-08-08 9:16 ` [OE-core] " André Draszik
2016-08-08 9:16 ` André Draszik
2016-08-08 15:21 ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
2016-08-08 15:21 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-08 15:21 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-08 15:59 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2016-08-08 15:59 ` Richard Purdie
2016-08-08 23:16 ` [OE-core] " Burton, Ross
2016-08-08 23:16 ` Burton, Ross
2016-08-08 23:16 ` Burton, Ross
2016-08-09 14:42 ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
2016-08-09 14:42 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-09 14:42 ` Khem Raj
2016-08-09 15:24 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2016-08-09 15:24 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2016-08-09 15:24 ` Richard Purdie
2016-08-10 15:25 ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2016-08-10 15:25 ` [oe] " Martin Jansa
2016-08-10 15:25 ` [oe] " Martin Jansa
2016-08-08 23:06 ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
2016-08-08 23:06 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470756255.8166.51.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
--cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.