From: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>,
ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] kexec: Consider crashk_low_res in sanity_check_segment_list()
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:50:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471398657-20237-2-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471398657-20237-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com>
We have crashk_res only in most cases, but sometimes we have
crashk_low_res.
For example, on 64-bit x86 systems, when "crashkernel=32M,high"
combined with "crashkernel=128M,low" is used, so some segments
may have the chance to be loaded into crashk_low_res area. We
can't fail it as a memory violation in these cases.
Thus, we add the case to regard the segment as valid if it is
within crashk_low_res.
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
---
kernel/kexec_core.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
index 707d18e..9012a60 100644
--- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
+++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
@@ -248,9 +248,14 @@ int sanity_check_segment_list(struct kimage *image)
mstart = image->segment[i].mem;
mend = mstart + image->segment[i].memsz - 1;
/* Ensure we are within the crash kernel limits */
- if ((mstart < phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_res.start)) ||
- (mend > phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_res.end)))
- return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
+ if ((mstart >= phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_res.start)) &&
+ (mend <= phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_res.end)))
+ continue;
+ if ((mstart >= phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_low_res.start)) &&
+ (mend <= phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_low_res.end)))
+ continue;
+
+ return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
}
}
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] kexec: Consider crashk_low_res in sanity_check_segment_list()
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:50:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471398657-20237-2-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471398657-20237-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com>
We have crashk_res only in most cases, but sometimes we have
crashk_low_res.
For example, on 64-bit x86 systems, when "crashkernel=32M,high"
combined with "crashkernel=128M,low" is used, so some segments
may have the chance to be loaded into crashk_low_res area. We
can't fail it as a memory violation in these cases.
Thus, we add the case to regard the segment as valid if it is
within crashk_low_res.
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
---
kernel/kexec_core.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
index 707d18e..9012a60 100644
--- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
+++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
@@ -248,9 +248,14 @@ int sanity_check_segment_list(struct kimage *image)
mstart = image->segment[i].mem;
mend = mstart + image->segment[i].memsz - 1;
/* Ensure we are within the crash kernel limits */
- if ((mstart < phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_res.start)) ||
- (mend > phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_res.end)))
- return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
+ if ((mstart >= phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_res.start)) &&
+ (mend <= phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_res.end)))
+ continue;
+ if ((mstart >= phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_low_res.start)) &&
+ (mend <= phys_to_boot_phys(crashk_low_res.end)))
+ continue;
+
+ return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
}
}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-17 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-17 1:50 [PATCH v2 1/2] kexec: Introduce "/sys/kernel/kexec_crash_low_size" Xunlei Pang
2016-08-17 1:50 ` Xunlei Pang
2016-08-17 1:50 ` Xunlei Pang [this message]
2016-08-17 1:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kexec: Consider crashk_low_res in sanity_check_segment_list() Xunlei Pang
2016-08-17 7:24 ` Dave Young
2016-08-17 7:24 ` Dave Young
2016-08-17 7:43 ` Xunlei Pang
2016-08-17 7:43 ` Xunlei Pang
2016-08-17 8:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kexec: Introduce "/sys/kernel/kexec_crash_low_size" Dave Young
2016-08-17 8:20 ` Dave Young
2016-08-24 1:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2016-08-24 1:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2016-08-24 8:20 ` Dave Young
2016-08-24 8:20 ` Dave Young
2016-08-24 11:37 ` Xunlei Pang
2016-08-24 11:37 ` Xunlei Pang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1471398657-20237-2-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com \
--to=xlpang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.