zlib vulnerability and modutils

zlib vulnerability and modutils

[Keith Owens]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

A double free vulnerability has been found in zlib which can be used in
a DoS or possibly in an exploit.  Distributions are now shipping
upgraded versions of zlib, installing the new version of zlib will fix
programs that use the shared library.

modutils has an option --enable-zlib which lets modprobe and insmod
read modules that have been compressed with gzip.  If you built your
modutils with --enable-zlib and are using insmod.static then you must
rebuild modutils after first upgrading zlib.  This only applies if
modutils was built with --enable-zlib (the default is not to use zlib)
and you also use static versions of modutils.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999

iD8DBQE8jTYQi4UHNye0ZOoRAnnhAKCrNZ2l8i1JHEVY3fJBnGYrpqAEBgCcDM0q
tPtmhPq2fdJODlfzLlAatmU=
=8r7c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: zlib vulnerability and modutils

[Ville Herva]

On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:56:20AM +1100, you [Keith Owens] wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> A double free vulnerability has been found in zlib which can be used in
> a DoS or possibly in an exploit.  Distributions are now shipping
> upgraded versions of zlib, installing the new version of zlib will fix
> programs that use the shared library.

Is there a patch for the kernel ppp zlib implementation available somewhere?
I'd like to patch the kernels I'm running rather than stuffing a random
vendor kernel to the boxes...


-- v --

v@iki.fi

Re: zlib vulnerability and modutils

[David Woodhouse]

vherva@niksula.hut.fi said:
>  Is there a patch for the kernel ppp zlib implementation available
> somewhere? I'd like to patch the kernels I'm running rather than
> stuffing a random vendor kernel to the boxes... 

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/dwmw2/linux-2.4.19-shared-zlib.bz2

That's a backport of the shared zlib from 2.5.6. As it does all its 
memory allocation beforehand, I _assume_ it doesn't suffer the same problem.

It may be a little more intrusive than you wanted though.

--
dwmw2

Re: zlib vulnerability and modutils

[Ville Herva]

On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 12:04:53AM +0000, you [David Woodhouse] wrote:
> 
> vherva@niksula.hut.fi said:
> >  Is there a patch for the kernel ppp zlib implementation available
> > somewhere? I'd like to patch the kernels I'm running rather than
> > stuffing a random vendor kernel to the boxes... 
> 
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/dwmw2/linux-2.4.19-shared-zlib.bz2
> 
> That's a backport of the shared zlib from 2.5.6. As it does all its 
> memory allocation beforehand, I _assume_ it doesn't suffer the same problem.

Thanks.
 
> It may be a little more intrusive than you wanted though.

Quite possibly -- at least considering that some of the kernels I run are
still 2.2.x and even 2.0.x...

I'll have a look anyway.


-- v --

v@iki.fi

Re: zlib vulnerability and modutils

[Ville Herva]

On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:08:28AM +0200, you [Ville Herva] wrote:
> >
> > It may be a little more intrusive than you wanted though.
> 
> Quite possibly -- at least considering that some of the kernels I run are
> still 2.2.x and even 2.0.x...

I suppose this patch

http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/zlib/infblock.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.2&r2=text&tr2=1.6&f=u

i closer to what I need. It seems most vendors have only patched ppp's zlib
implementation (drivers/net/zlib.c). I couldn't find that particular patch
in redhat update kernel .src.rpm, tough. I guess I'll have to apply the zlib
diff by hand.


-- v --

v@iki.fi

Re: zlib vulnerability and modutils

[Ville Herva]

On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 11:46:42AM +0200, you [Ville Herva] wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:08:28AM +0200, you [Ville Herva] wrote:
> > >
> > > It may be a little more intrusive than you wanted though.
> > 
> > Quite possibly -- at least considering that some of the kernels I run are
> > still 2.2.x and even 2.0.x...
> 
> I suppose this patch
> 
> http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/zlib/infblock.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.2&r2=text&tr2=1.6&f=u
> 
> is closer to what I need. It seems most vendors have only patched ppp's zlib
> implementation (drivers/net/zlib.c). I couldn't find that particular patch
> in redhat update kernel .src.rpm, tough. I guess I'll have to apply the zlib
> diff by hand.

Ok, I found the following in the redhat errata kernel .src.rpm. It was well
hidden in ipvs-1.0.6-2.2.19.patch... I guess this is the same that Arjan
sent to Alan.

However, this does not apply to 2.0. 


-- v --

v@iki.fi

--- linux/drivers/net/zlib.c	Fri Feb  8 10:35:28 2001
+++ linux/drivers/net/zlib.c	Fri Feb  8 10:35:30 2001
@@ -3860,10 +3860,11 @@
                              &s->sub.trees.tb, z);
       if (t != Z_OK)
       {
-        ZFREE(z, s->sub.trees.blens);
         r = t;
-        if (r == Z_DATA_ERROR)
+        if (r == Z_DATA_ERROR) {
           s->mode = BADB;
+          ZFREE(z, s->sub.trees.blens);
+        }
         LEAVE
       }
       s->sub.trees.index = 0;
@@ -3928,14 +3929,16 @@
 #endif
         t = inflate_trees_dynamic(257 + (t & 0x1f), 1 + ((t >> 5) & 0x1f),
                                   s->sub.trees.blens, &bl, &bd, &tl, &td, z);
-        ZFREE(z, s->sub.trees.blens);
         if (t != Z_OK)
         {
-          if (t == (uInt)Z_DATA_ERROR)
+          if (t == (uInt)Z_DATA_ERROR) {
             s->mode = BADB;
+            ZFREE(z, s->sub.trees.blens);
+          }
           r = t;
           LEAVE
         }
+        ZFREE(z, s->sub.trees.blens);
         Tracev((stderr, "inflate:       trees ok, %d * %d bytes used\n",
               inflate_hufts, sizeof(inflate_huft)));
         if ((c = inflate_codes_new(bl, bd, tl, td, z)) == Z_NULL)

Re: zlib vulnerability and modutils

[Ville Herva]

On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:56:20AM +1100, you [Keith Owens] wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> A double free vulnerability has been found in zlib which can be used in
> a DoS or possibly in an exploit.  Distributions are now shipping
> upgraded versions of zlib, installing the new version of zlib will fix
> programs that use the shared library.
> 
> modutils has an option --enable-zlib which lets modprobe and insmod
> read modules that have been compressed with gzip.  If you built your
> modutils with --enable-zlib and are using insmod.static then you must
> rebuild modutils after first upgrading zlib.  This only applies if
> modutils was built with --enable-zlib (the default is not to use zlib)
> and you also use static versions of modutils.

I'm propably missing something, but if you load untrusted kernel modules
(compressed or not), isn't the zlib vulnerability least of your concerns?



-- v --

v@iki.fi