From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] radix-tree: Fix optimisation problem
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:53:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474570415-14938-3-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1474570415-14938-1-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com>
From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
When compiling the radix tree with -O2, GCC thinks it can optimise:
void *entry = parent->slots[offset];
int siboff = entry - parent->slots;
void *slot = parent->slots + siboff;
into
void *slot = entry;
Unfortunately, 'entry' is a tagged pointer, so this optimisation leads
to getting an unaligned pointer back from radix_tree_lookup_slot().
The test suite wasn't being compiled with optimisation, so we hadn't
spotted it before now. Change the test suite to compile with -O2, and
fix the optimisation problem by passing 'entry' through entry_to_node()
so gcc knows this isn't a plain pointer.
---
lib/radix-tree.c | 3 ++-
tools/testing/radix-tree/Makefile | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/radix-tree.c b/lib/radix-tree.c
index 1b7bf73..8bf1f32 100644
--- a/lib/radix-tree.c
+++ b/lib/radix-tree.c
@@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ static unsigned int radix_tree_descend(struct radix_tree_node *parent,
#ifdef CONFIG_RADIX_TREE_MULTIORDER
if (radix_tree_is_internal_node(entry)) {
- unsigned long siboff = get_slot_offset(parent, entry);
+ unsigned long siboff = get_slot_offset(parent,
+ (void **)entry_to_node(entry));
if (siboff < RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE) {
offset = siboff;
entry = rcu_dereference_raw(parent->slots[offset]);
diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/Makefile b/tools/testing/radix-tree/Makefile
index 3b53046..9d0919ed 100644
--- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-CFLAGS += -I. -g -Wall -D_LGPL_SOURCE
+CFLAGS += -I. -g -O2 -Wall -D_LGPL_SOURCE
LDFLAGS += -lpthread -lurcu
TARGETS = main
OFILES = main.o radix-tree.o linux.o test.o tag_check.o find_next_bit.o \
--
2.9.3
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] radix-tree: Fix optimisation problem
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:53:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474570415-14938-3-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1474570415-14938-1-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com>
From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
When compiling the radix tree with -O2, GCC thinks it can optimise:
void *entry = parent->slots[offset];
int siboff = entry - parent->slots;
void *slot = parent->slots + siboff;
into
void *slot = entry;
Unfortunately, 'entry' is a tagged pointer, so this optimisation leads
to getting an unaligned pointer back from radix_tree_lookup_slot().
The test suite wasn't being compiled with optimisation, so we hadn't
spotted it before now. Change the test suite to compile with -O2, and
fix the optimisation problem by passing 'entry' through entry_to_node()
so gcc knows this isn't a plain pointer.
---
lib/radix-tree.c | 3 ++-
tools/testing/radix-tree/Makefile | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/radix-tree.c b/lib/radix-tree.c
index 1b7bf73..8bf1f32 100644
--- a/lib/radix-tree.c
+++ b/lib/radix-tree.c
@@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ static unsigned int radix_tree_descend(struct radix_tree_node *parent,
#ifdef CONFIG_RADIX_TREE_MULTIORDER
if (radix_tree_is_internal_node(entry)) {
- unsigned long siboff = get_slot_offset(parent, entry);
+ unsigned long siboff = get_slot_offset(parent,
+ (void **)entry_to_node(entry));
if (siboff < RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE) {
offset = siboff;
entry = rcu_dereference_raw(parent->slots[offset]);
diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/Makefile b/tools/testing/radix-tree/Makefile
index 3b53046..9d0919ed 100644
--- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-CFLAGS += -I. -g -Wall -D_LGPL_SOURCE
+CFLAGS += -I. -g -O2 -Wall -D_LGPL_SOURCE
LDFLAGS += -lpthread -lurcu
TARGETS = main
OFILES = main.o radix-tree.o linux.o test.o tag_check.o find_next_bit.o \
--
2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-22 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-22 18:53 [PATCH 0/2] Fix radix_tree_lookup_slot() Matthew Wilcox
2016-09-22 18:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-09-22 18:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] radix tree test suite: Test radix_tree_replace_slot() for multiorder entries Matthew Wilcox
2016-09-22 18:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-09-22 18:53 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2016-09-22 18:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] radix-tree: Fix optimisation problem Matthew Wilcox
2016-09-22 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-22 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-23 20:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-09-24 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-24 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-24 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-24 21:04 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-09-24 21:04 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-09-24 22:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-24 22:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-26 4:26 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-09-24 8:36 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-09-24 8:36 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-09-24 23:35 ` Cedric Blancher
2016-09-24 23:35 ` Cedric Blancher
2016-09-25 0:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-25 0:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-25 17:59 ` Cedric Blancher
2016-09-25 17:59 ` Cedric Blancher
2016-09-25 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-25 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-25 19:40 ` Cedric Blancher
2016-09-25 19:40 ` Cedric Blancher
2016-09-25 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-26 21:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-09-26 21:48 ` Cedric Blancher
2016-09-26 21:48 ` Cedric Blancher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1474570415-14938-3-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com \
--to=mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.