From: Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com (Alexey Brodkin)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame)
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 12:38:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474893488.4184.14.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE2F3rBjKsEGpbUMhGLthx-Ue=LQCqEPtbB20bG2P=D2nbwYsw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 2016-09-23@18:04 -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Alexey Brodkin
> <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-09-22@15:37 -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry, that was a misunderstanding. Buildroot routinely runs the strip
> > > command on .ko files before installing them on the target. I was only
> > > looking at the .ko files *after* running the strip command. No, the
> > > interim patch was not in my tree.
> >
> > Well are you sure buildroot really touches modules in Linux kernel build folder?
> > Buildroot just runs a simple "make" command in "output/build/linux-x.y".
>
> Sorry, that was phrased badly. Buildroot does not touch the modules in
> the Linux kernel build folder. Modules are stripped in the target
> directory as you described.
So every is as expected now for you or there're still thing you don't like?
-Alexey
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
To: "danielmentz@google.com" <danielmentz@google.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com" <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>,
"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame)
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 12:38:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474893488.4184.14.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE2F3rBjKsEGpbUMhGLthx-Ue=LQCqEPtbB20bG2P=D2nbwYsw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:04 -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Alexey Brodkin
> <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 15:37 -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry, that was a misunderstanding. Buildroot routinely runs the strip
> > > command on .ko files before installing them on the target. I was only
> > > looking at the .ko files *after* running the strip command. No, the
> > > interim patch was not in my tree.
> >
> > Well are you sure buildroot really touches modules in Linux kernel build folder?
> > Buildroot just runs a simple "make" command in "output/build/linux-x.y".
>
> Sorry, that was phrased badly. Buildroot does not touch the modules in
> the Linux kernel build folder. Modules are stripped in the target
> directory as you described.
So every is as expected now for you or there're still thing you don't like?
-Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-26 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-19 21:49 [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARC: module: support R_ARC_32_PCREL relocation Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARC: dw2 unwind: factor CIE specifics for .eh_frame/.debug_frame Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARC: dw2 unwind: switch to .eh_frame based unwinding Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-20 1:21 ` [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame Daniel Mentz
2016-09-20 1:21 ` Daniel Mentz
2016-09-20 6:13 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-20 6:13 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-22 20:39 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-22 20:39 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-22 20:59 ` modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame) Vineet Gupta
2016-09-22 20:59 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-22 22:37 ` Daniel Mentz
2016-09-22 22:37 ` Daniel Mentz
2016-09-23 10:38 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-23 10:38 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-24 1:04 ` Daniel Mentz
2016-09-24 1:04 ` Daniel Mentz
2016-09-26 12:38 ` Alexey Brodkin [this message]
2016-09-26 12:38 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-26 18:51 ` Daniel Mentz
2016-09-26 18:51 ` Daniel Mentz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1474893488.4184.14.camel@synopsys.com \
--to=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.