* [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC
@ 2013-08-07 11:23 Laurent Pinchart
2013-08-08 0:43 ` Laurent Pinchart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-08-07 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Airlie, dri-devel
Hi Dave,
The following changes since commit 32c913e4369ce7bd1d16a9b6983f7b8975c13f5a:
Merge tag 'drm-intel-next-2013-07-26-fixed' of
git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel into drm-next (2013-08-07
18:11:35 +1000)
are available in the git repository at:
git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git drm/next/du
for you to fetch changes up to 59e8f92fca87577b0f43516503f2abde9790a3a6:
drm/rcar-du: Add FBDEV emulation support (2013-08-07 13:04:44 +0200)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Laurent Pinchart (23):
drm/rcar-du: Add missing alpha plane register definitions
drm/rcar-du: Use devm_ioremap_resource()
drm/rcar-du: Add platform module device table
drm/rcar-du: Support per-CRTC clock and IRQ
drm/rcar-du: Clarify comment regarding plane Y source coordinate
drm/rcar-du: Split LVDS encoder and connector
drm/rcar-du: Split VGA encoder and connector
drm/rcar-du: Merge LVDS and VGA encoder code
drm/rcar-du: Rename platform data fields to match what they describe
drm/rcar-du: Create rcar_du_planes structure
drm/rcar-du: Rename rcar_du_plane_(init|register) to rcar_du_planes_*
drm/rcar-du: Introduce CRTCs groups
drm/rcar-du: Use dynamic number of CRTCs instead of CRTCs array size
drm/rcar-du: Remove register definitions for the second channel
drm/rcar-du: Move output routing configuration to group
drm/rcar-du: Add support for the R8A7790 DU
drm/rcar-du: Fix buffer pitch alignment for R8A7790 DU
drm/rcar-du: Add support for multiple groups
drm/rcar-du: Add support for DEFR8 register
drm/rcar-du: Rework output routing support
drm/rcar-du: Configure RGB output routing to DPAD0
drm/rcar-du: Add internal LVDS encoder support
drm/rcar-du: Add FBDEV emulation support
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 7 +
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile | 10 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 255 +++++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.h | 13 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 173 +++++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h | 63 ++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c | 202 +++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h | 49 +++++
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c | 187 +++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h | 50 +++++
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c | 165 ++++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.h | 29 +--
.../drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_lvds.c => rcar_du_lvdscon.c} | 101 +---------
.../drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_lvds.h => rcar_du_lvdscon.h} | 17 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c | 196 +++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h | 46 +++++
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c | 170 +++++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.h | 26 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h | 94 +++++++--
.../gpu/drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_vga.c => rcar_du_vgacon.c} | 65 +-----
.../gpu/drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_vga.h => rcar_du_vgacon.h} | 15 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h | 69 +++++++
include/linux/platform_data/rcar-du.h | 34 +++-
23 files changed, 1420 insertions(+), 616 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h
rename drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_lvds.c => rcar_du_lvdscon.c} (57%)
rename drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_lvds.h => rcar_du_lvdscon.h} (53%)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h
rename drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_vga.c => rcar_du_vgacon.c} (59%)
rename drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_vga.h => rcar_du_vgacon.h} (56%)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC 2013-08-07 11:23 [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-08-08 0:43 ` Laurent Pinchart 2013-08-08 0:57 ` Dave Airlie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-08-08 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dri-devel Hi Dave, I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and that I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream through the arm-soc tree. Would you be able to provide a stable branch with this patch set based on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ? Ideally that branch should have as little patches as possible other than this set. On Wednesday 07 August 2013 13:23:08 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Dave, > > The following changes since commit 32c913e4369ce7bd1d16a9b6983f7b8975c13f5a: > > Merge tag 'drm-intel-next-2013-07-26-fixed' of > git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel into drm-next (2013-08-07 > 18:11:35 +1000) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git drm/next/du > > for you to fetch changes up to 59e8f92fca87577b0f43516503f2abde9790a3a6: > > drm/rcar-du: Add FBDEV emulation support (2013-08-07 13:04:44 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Laurent Pinchart (23): > drm/rcar-du: Add missing alpha plane register definitions > drm/rcar-du: Use devm_ioremap_resource() > drm/rcar-du: Add platform module device table > drm/rcar-du: Support per-CRTC clock and IRQ > drm/rcar-du: Clarify comment regarding plane Y source coordinate > drm/rcar-du: Split LVDS encoder and connector > drm/rcar-du: Split VGA encoder and connector > drm/rcar-du: Merge LVDS and VGA encoder code > drm/rcar-du: Rename platform data fields to match what they describe > drm/rcar-du: Create rcar_du_planes structure > drm/rcar-du: Rename rcar_du_plane_(init|register) to rcar_du_planes_* > drm/rcar-du: Introduce CRTCs groups > drm/rcar-du: Use dynamic number of CRTCs instead of CRTCs array size > drm/rcar-du: Remove register definitions for the second channel > drm/rcar-du: Move output routing configuration to group > drm/rcar-du: Add support for the R8A7790 DU > drm/rcar-du: Fix buffer pitch alignment for R8A7790 DU > drm/rcar-du: Add support for multiple groups > drm/rcar-du: Add support for DEFR8 register > drm/rcar-du: Rework output routing support > drm/rcar-du: Configure RGB output routing to DPAD0 > drm/rcar-du: Add internal LVDS encoder support > drm/rcar-du: Add FBDEV emulation support > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 7 + > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile | 10 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 255 > +++++++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.h | > 13 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 173 > +++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h | > 63 ++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c | 202 > +++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h | > 49 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c | 187 > +++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h | > 50 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c | 165 > ++++++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.h | > 29 +-- .../drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_lvds.c => rcar_du_lvdscon.c} | 101 > +--------- .../drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_lvds.h => rcar_du_lvdscon.h} | 17 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c | 196 > +++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h | > 46 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c | 170 > +++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.h | > 26 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h | 94 > +++++++-- .../gpu/drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_vga.c => rcar_du_vgacon.c} | 65 > +----- .../gpu/drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_vga.h => rcar_du_vgacon.h} | 15 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h | 69 +++++++ > include/linux/platform_data/rcar-du.h | 34 +++- > 23 files changed, 1420 insertions(+), 616 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h > rename drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_lvds.c => rcar_du_lvdscon.c} (57%) > rename drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_lvds.h => rcar_du_lvdscon.h} (53%) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h > rename drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_vga.c => rcar_du_vgacon.c} (59%) > rename drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/{rcar_du_vga.h => rcar_du_vgacon.h} (56%) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC 2013-08-08 0:43 ` Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-08-08 0:57 ` Dave Airlie 2013-08-08 1:34 ` Laurent Pinchart 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2013-08-08 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Pinchart; +Cc: dri-devel On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and that I > would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream through the arm-soc > tree. Would you be able to provide a stable branch with this patch set based > on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ? Ideally that branch should have as little > patches as possible other than this set. Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface changes or things with this wrt drm-next? i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next? Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC 2013-08-08 0:57 ` Dave Airlie @ 2013-08-08 1:34 ` Laurent Pinchart 2013-08-08 1:39 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-08-08 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie; +Cc: horms, dri-devel Hi Dave, (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer) On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and that > > I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream through the > > arm-soc tree. Would you be able to provide a stable branch with this > > patch set based on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ? Ideally that branch should > > have as little patches as possible other than this set. > > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface changes or > things with this wrt drm-next? > > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next? They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can base the branch on any -rc >= 2. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC 2013-08-08 1:34 ` Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-08-08 1:39 ` Simon Horman 2013-08-09 20:45 ` Dave Airlie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2013-08-08 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Pinchart; +Cc: dri-devel On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:34:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Dave, > > (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer) > > On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and that > > > I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream through the > > > arm-soc tree. Would you be able to provide a stable branch with this > > > patch set based on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ? Ideally that branch should > > > have as little patches as possible other than this set. > > > > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface changes or > > things with this wrt drm-next? > > > > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next? > > They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can base the > branch on any -rc >= 2. An rc2 or rc3 base would be ideal for me, but any rc would be fine. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC 2013-08-08 1:39 ` Simon Horman @ 2013-08-09 20:45 ` Dave Airlie 2013-08-09 21:25 ` Laurent Pinchart 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2013-08-09 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Horman; +Cc: Laurent Pinchart, dri-devel On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:34:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer) >> >> On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> > > Hi Dave, >> > > >> > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and that >> > > I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream through the >> > > arm-soc tree. Would you be able to provide a stable branch with this >> > > patch set based on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ? Ideally that branch should >> > > have as little patches as possible other than this set. >> > >> > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface changes or >> > things with this wrt drm-next? >> > >> > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next? >> >> They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can base the >> branch on any -rc >= 2. > > An rc2 or rc3 base would be ideal for me, but any rc would be fine. So the problem with making a stable branch is we have conflicts in other places that have already been solved in drm-next, is there any problem with using Laurent's tree directly as the stable point? Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC 2013-08-09 20:45 ` Dave Airlie @ 2013-08-09 21:25 ` Laurent Pinchart 2013-08-09 21:28 ` Dave Airlie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-08-09 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie; +Cc: Simon Horman, dri-devel Hi Dave, On Saturday 10 August 2013 06:45:05 Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:34:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> Hi Dave, > >> > >> (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer) > >> > >> On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote: > >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> > > Hi Dave, > >> > > > >> > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and > >> > > that I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream > >> > > through the arm-soc tree. Would you be able to provide a stable > >> > > branch with this patch set based on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ? > >> > > Ideally that branch should have as little patches as possible other > >> > > than this set. > >> > > >> > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface changes > >> > or things with this wrt drm-next? > >> > > >> > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next? > >> > >> They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can base the > >> branch on any -rc >= 2. > > > > An rc2 or rc3 base would be ideal for me, but any rc would be fine. > > So the problem with making a stable branch is we have conflicts in other > places that have already been solved in drm-next, > > is there any problem with using Laurent's tree directly as the stable point? As agreed on IRC, I've rebased the patches on top of v3.11-rc3 and pushed the result to git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git drm/next/du b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 7 b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile | 10 - b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 255 +++++++++++++------------- b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.h | 13 - b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 173 +++++++----------- b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h | 63 +++++- b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h | 49 +++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h | 50 +++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c | 165 ++++++++++-------- b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.h | 29 --- b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.c | 131 ++++++++++++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.h | 25 ++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h | 46 +++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c | 170 +++++++++--------- b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.h | 26 ++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h | 94 ++++++++-- b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.c | 96 ++++++++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.h | 23 ++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h | 69 +++++++ b/include/linux/platform_data/rcar-du.h | 34 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.c | 216 ----------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.h | 24 -- drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.c | 149 ---------------- drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.h | 24 -- 27 files changed, 1665 insertions(+), 861 deletions(-) Can you merge that into drm-next ? Simon, you can base the r8a7790 arch/ patches on top of this drm/next/du branch. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC 2013-08-09 21:25 ` Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-08-09 21:28 ` Dave Airlie 2013-08-13 2:18 ` Simon Horman 2013-08-21 8:36 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2013-08-09 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Pinchart; +Cc: Simon Horman, dri-devel On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Saturday 10 August 2013 06:45:05 Dave Airlie wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:34:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> >> Hi Dave, >> >> >> >> (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer) >> >> >> >> On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> >> > > Hi Dave, >> >> > > >> >> > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and >> >> > > that I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream >> >> > > through the arm-soc tree. Would you be able to provide a stable >> >> > > branch with this patch set based on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ? >> >> > > Ideally that branch should have as little patches as possible other >> >> > > than this set. >> >> > >> >> > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface changes >> >> > or things with this wrt drm-next? >> >> > >> >> > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next? >> >> >> >> They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can base the >> >> branch on any -rc >= 2. >> > >> > An rc2 or rc3 base would be ideal for me, but any rc would be fine. >> >> So the problem with making a stable branch is we have conflicts in other >> places that have already been solved in drm-next, >> >> is there any problem with using Laurent's tree directly as the stable point? > > As agreed on IRC, I've rebased the patches on top of v3.11-rc3 and pushed the > result to > > git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git drm/next/du > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 7 > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile | 10 - > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 255 +++++++++++++------------- > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.h | 13 - > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 173 +++++++----------- > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h | 63 +++++- > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h | 49 +++++ > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++ > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h | 50 +++++ > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c | 165 ++++++++++-------- > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.h | 29 --- > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.c | 131 ++++++++++++++ > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.h | 25 ++ > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++ > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h | 46 +++++ > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c | 170 +++++++++--------- > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.h | 26 ++ > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h | 94 ++++++++-- > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.c | 96 ++++++++++ > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.h | 23 ++ > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h | 69 +++++++ > b/include/linux/platform_data/rcar-du.h | 34 ++- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.c | 216 ----------------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.h | 24 -- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.c | 149 ---------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.h | 24 -- > 27 files changed, 1665 insertions(+), 861 deletions(-) > > Can you merge that into drm-next ? Simon, you can base the r8a7790 arch/ > patches on top of this drm/next/du branch. Actually small change Simon can you use git://git.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-rcar-for-v3.12 as I've merged this tree with an S-o-b on the merge commit, so other people will know it has gone via me. Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC 2013-08-09 21:28 ` Dave Airlie @ 2013-08-13 2:18 ` Simon Horman 2013-08-21 8:36 ` Simon Horman 1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2013-08-13 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie; +Cc: Laurent Pinchart, dri-devel On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:28:30AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Laurent Pinchart > <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > On Saturday 10 August 2013 06:45:05 Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:34:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> >> Hi Dave, > >> >> > >> >> (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer) > >> >> > >> >> On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote: > >> >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> >> > > Hi Dave, > >> >> > > > >> >> > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and > >> >> > > that I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream > >> >> > > through the arm-soc tree. Would you be able to provide a stable > >> >> > > branch with this patch set based on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ? > >> >> > > Ideally that branch should have as little patches as possible other > >> >> > > than this set. > >> >> > > >> >> > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface changes > >> >> > or things with this wrt drm-next? > >> >> > > >> >> > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next? > >> >> > >> >> They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can base the > >> >> branch on any -rc >= 2. > >> > > >> > An rc2 or rc3 base would be ideal for me, but any rc would be fine. > >> > >> So the problem with making a stable branch is we have conflicts in other > >> places that have already been solved in drm-next, > >> > >> is there any problem with using Laurent's tree directly as the stable point? > > > > As agreed on IRC, I've rebased the patches on top of v3.11-rc3 and pushed the > > result to > > > > git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git drm/next/du > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 7 > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile | 10 - > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 255 +++++++++++++------------- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.h | 13 - > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 173 +++++++----------- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h | 63 +++++- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h | 49 +++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h | 50 +++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c | 165 ++++++++++-------- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.h | 29 --- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.c | 131 ++++++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.h | 25 ++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h | 46 +++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c | 170 +++++++++--------- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.h | 26 ++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h | 94 ++++++++-- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.c | 96 ++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.h | 23 ++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h | 69 +++++++ > > b/include/linux/platform_data/rcar-du.h | 34 ++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.c | 216 ----------------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.h | 24 -- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.c | 149 ---------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.h | 24 -- > > 27 files changed, 1665 insertions(+), 861 deletions(-) > > > > Can you merge that into drm-next ? Simon, you can base the r8a7790 arch/ > > patches on top of this drm/next/du branch. > > Actually small change > > Simon can you use > > git://git.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-rcar-for-v3.12 > > as I've merged this tree with an S-o-b on the merge commit, so other > people will know it has gone via me. Thanks, got it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC 2013-08-09 21:28 ` Dave Airlie 2013-08-13 2:18 ` Simon Horman @ 2013-08-21 8:36 ` Simon Horman 2013-08-21 11:31 ` Laurent Pinchart 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2013-08-21 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie; +Cc: Laurent Pinchart, dri-devel On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:28:30AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Laurent Pinchart > <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > On Saturday 10 August 2013 06:45:05 Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:34:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> >> Hi Dave, > >> >> > >> >> (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer) > >> >> > >> >> On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote: > >> >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> >> > > Hi Dave, > >> >> > > > >> >> > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and > >> >> > > that I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream > >> >> > > through the arm-soc tree. Would you be able to provide a stable > >> >> > > branch with this patch set based on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ? > >> >> > > Ideally that branch should have as little patches as possible other > >> >> > > than this set. > >> >> > > >> >> > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface changes > >> >> > or things with this wrt drm-next? > >> >> > > >> >> > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next? > >> >> > >> >> They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can base the > >> >> branch on any -rc >= 2. > >> > > >> > An rc2 or rc3 base would be ideal for me, but any rc would be fine. > >> > >> So the problem with making a stable branch is we have conflicts in other > >> places that have already been solved in drm-next, > >> > >> is there any problem with using Laurent's tree directly as the stable point? > > > > As agreed on IRC, I've rebased the patches on top of v3.11-rc3 and pushed the > > result to > > > > git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git drm/next/du > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 7 > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile | 10 - > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 255 +++++++++++++------------- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.h | 13 - > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 173 +++++++----------- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h | 63 +++++- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h | 49 +++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h | 50 +++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c | 165 ++++++++++-------- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.h | 29 --- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.c | 131 ++++++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.h | 25 ++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h | 46 +++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c | 170 +++++++++--------- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.h | 26 ++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h | 94 ++++++++-- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.c | 96 ++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.h | 23 ++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h | 69 +++++++ > > b/include/linux/platform_data/rcar-du.h | 34 ++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.c | 216 ----------------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.h | 24 -- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.c | 149 ---------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.h | 24 -- > > 27 files changed, 1665 insertions(+), 861 deletions(-) > > > > Can you merge that into drm-next ? Simon, you can base the r8a7790 arch/ > > patches on top of this drm/next/du branch. > > Actually small change > > Simon can you use > > git://git.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-rcar-for-v3.12 > > as I've merged this tree with an S-o-b on the merge commit, so other > people will know it has gone via me. Sorry for the delayed response. I had assumed that the reason I was having trouble fetching the remote above was related to the internet connection at the end of the world that I was in turn at the end while on holidays. However, it seems that I am unable to fetch the remote from my office either. This may well be a fault at my end, but its not something I can readily think of a work around for other than trying from home a little later. # git remote add airlied git://git.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux # git fetch airlied fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC 2013-08-21 8:36 ` Simon Horman @ 2013-08-21 11:31 ` Laurent Pinchart 2013-08-22 2:29 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-08-21 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Horman; +Cc: dri-devel Hi Simon, On Wednesday 21 August 2013 17:36:12 Simon Horman wrote: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:28:30AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Saturday 10 August 2013 06:45:05 Dave Airlie wrote: > > >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > >> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:34:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > >> >> Hi Dave, > > >> >> > > >> >> (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer) > > >> >> > > >> >> On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote: > > >> >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > >> >> > > Hi Dave, > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this > > >> >> > > series and that I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should > > >> >> > > go upstream through the arm-soc tree. Would you be able to > > >> >> > > provide a stable branch with this patch set based on one of the > > >> >> > > 3.11-rcX tags ? > > >> >> > > Ideally that branch should have as little patches as possible > > >> >> > > other than this set. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface > > >> >> > changes or things with this wrt drm-next? > > >> >> > > > >> >> > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next? > > >> >> > > >> >> They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can > > >> >> base the branch on any -rc >= 2. > > >> > > > >> > An rc2 or rc3 base would be ideal for me, but any rc would be fine. > > >> > > >> So the problem with making a stable branch is we have conflicts in > > >> other places that have already been solved in drm-next, > > >> > > >> is there any problem with using Laurent's tree directly as the stable > > >> point? > > > > > > As agreed on IRC, I've rebased the patches on top of v3.11-rc3 and > > > pushed the result to > > > > > > git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git drm/next/du > > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 7 > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile | 10 - > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 255 ++++++++++---------- > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.h | 13 - > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 173 +++++++----------- > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h | 63 +++++- > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h | 49 +++++ > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h | 50 +++++ > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c | 165 ++++++++++-------- > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.h | 29 --- > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.c | 131 ++++++++++++++ > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.h | 25 ++ > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h | 46 +++++ > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c | 170 +++++++++--------- > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.h | 26 ++ > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h | 94 ++++++++-- > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.c | 96 ++++++++++ > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.h | 23 ++ > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h | 69 +++++++ > > > b/include/linux/platform_data/rcar-du.h | 34 ++- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.c | 216 -------------------- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.h | 24 -- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.c | 149 ---------------- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.h | 24 -- > > > 27 files changed, 1665 insertions(+), 861 deletions(-) > > > > > > Can you merge that into drm-next ? Simon, you can base the r8a7790 arch/ > > > patches on top of this drm/next/du branch. > > > > Actually small change > > > > Simon can you use > > > > git://git.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-rcar-for-v3.12 > > > > as I've merged this tree with an S-o-b on the merge commit, so other > > people will know it has gone via me. > > Sorry for the delayed response. > > I had assumed that the reason I was having trouble fetching > the remote above was related to the internet connection at the > end of the world that I was in turn at the end while on holidays. > > However, it seems that I am unable to fetch the remote from my office > either. This may well be a fault at my end, but its not something > I can readily think of a work around for other than trying from home a > little later. > > # git remote add airlied git://git.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux > # git fetch airlied > fatal: Could not read from remote repository. > > Please make sure you have the correct access rights > and the repository exists. The URL I use is git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC 2013-08-21 11:31 ` Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-08-22 2:29 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2013-08-22 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Pinchart; +Cc: dri-devel On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:31:42PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Wednesday 21 August 2013 17:36:12 Simon Horman wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:28:30AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > On Saturday 10 August 2013 06:45:05 Dave Airlie wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > > >> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:34:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > >> >> Hi Dave, > > > >> >> > > > >> >> (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer) > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote: > > > >> >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > >> >> > > Hi Dave, > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this > > > >> >> > > series and that I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should > > > >> >> > > go upstream through the arm-soc tree. Would you be able to > > > >> >> > > provide a stable branch with this patch set based on one of the > > > >> >> > > 3.11-rcX tags ? > > > >> >> > > Ideally that branch should have as little patches as possible > > > >> >> > > other than this set. > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface > > > >> >> > changes or things with this wrt drm-next? > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next? > > > >> >> > > > >> >> They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can > > > >> >> base the branch on any -rc >= 2. > > > >> > > > > >> > An rc2 or rc3 base would be ideal for me, but any rc would be fine. > > > >> > > > >> So the problem with making a stable branch is we have conflicts in > > > >> other places that have already been solved in drm-next, > > > >> > > > >> is there any problem with using Laurent's tree directly as the stable > > > >> point? > > > > > > > > As agreed on IRC, I've rebased the patches on top of v3.11-rc3 and > > > > pushed the result to > > > > > > > > git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git drm/next/du > > > > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 7 > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile | 10 - > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 255 ++++++++++---------- > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.h | 13 - > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 173 +++++++----------- > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h | 63 +++++- > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h | 49 +++++ > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h | 50 +++++ > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c | 165 ++++++++++-------- > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.h | 29 --- > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.c | 131 ++++++++++++++ > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.h | 25 ++ > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h | 46 +++++ > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c | 170 +++++++++--------- > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.h | 26 ++ > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h | 94 ++++++++-- > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.c | 96 ++++++++++ > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.h | 23 ++ > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h | 69 +++++++ > > > > b/include/linux/platform_data/rcar-du.h | 34 ++- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.c | 216 -------------------- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.h | 24 -- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.c | 149 ---------------- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.h | 24 -- > > > > 27 files changed, 1665 insertions(+), 861 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > Can you merge that into drm-next ? Simon, you can base the r8a7790 arch/ > > > > patches on top of this drm/next/du branch. > > > > > > Actually small change > > > > > > Simon can you use > > > > > > git://git.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-rcar-for-v3.12 > > > > > > as I've merged this tree with an S-o-b on the merge commit, so other > > > people will know it has gone via me. > > > > Sorry for the delayed response. > > > > I had assumed that the reason I was having trouble fetching > > the remote above was related to the internet connection at the > > end of the world that I was in turn at the end while on holidays. > > > > However, it seems that I am unable to fetch the remote from my office > > either. This may well be a fault at my end, but its not something > > I can readily think of a work around for other than trying from home a > > little later. > > > > # git remote add airlied git://git.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux > > # git fetch airlied > > fatal: Could not read from remote repository. > > > > Please make sure you have the correct access rights > > and the repository exists. > > The URL I use is git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux Thanks, that seems to work. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-08-22 2:30 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-08-07 11:23 [GIT PULL FOR v3.12] R-Car DU DRM support for R8A7790 SoC Laurent Pinchart 2013-08-08 0:43 ` Laurent Pinchart 2013-08-08 0:57 ` Dave Airlie 2013-08-08 1:34 ` Laurent Pinchart 2013-08-08 1:39 ` Simon Horman 2013-08-09 20:45 ` Dave Airlie 2013-08-09 21:25 ` Laurent Pinchart 2013-08-09 21:28 ` Dave Airlie 2013-08-13 2:18 ` Simon Horman 2013-08-21 8:36 ` Simon Horman 2013-08-21 11:31 ` Laurent Pinchart 2013-08-22 2:29 ` Simon Horman
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.