From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@lge.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] mm: prevent double decrease of nr_reserved_highatomic
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 14:45:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475819136-24358-3-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475819136-24358-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>
There is race between page freeing and unreserved highatomic.
CPU 0 CPU 1
free_hot_cold_page
mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype
set_pcppage_migratetype(page, mt)
unreserve_highatomic_pageblock
spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock)
move_freepages_block
set_pageblock_migratetype(page)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock)
free_pcppages_bulk
__free_one_page(mt) <- mt is stale
By above race, a page on CPU 0 could go non-highorderatomic free list
since the pageblock's type is changed. By that, unreserve logic of
highorderatomic can decrease reserved count on a same pageblock
several times and then it will make mismatch between
nr_reserved_highatomic and the number of reserved pageblock.
So, this patch verifies whether the pageblock is highatomic or not
and decrease the count only if the pageblock is highatomic.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index e7cbb3cc22fa..d110cd640264 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2133,13 +2133,25 @@ static void unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(const struct alloc_context *ac)
continue;
/*
- * It should never happen but changes to locking could
- * inadvertently allow a per-cpu drain to add pages
- * to MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC while unreserving so be safe
- * and watch for underflows.
+ * In page freeing path, migratetype change is racy so
+ * we can counter several free pages in a pageblock
+ * in this loop althoug we changed the pageblock type
+ * from highatomic to ac->migratetype. So we should
+ * adjust the count once.
*/
- zone->nr_reserved_highatomic -= min(pageblock_nr_pages,
- zone->nr_reserved_highatomic);
+ if (get_pageblock_migratetype(page) ==
+ MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC) {
+ /*
+ * It should never happen but changes to
+ * locking could inadvertently allow a per-cpu
+ * drain to add pages to MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC
+ * while unreserving so be safe and watch for
+ * underflows.
+ */
+ zone->nr_reserved_highatomic -= min(
+ pageblock_nr_pages,
+ zone->nr_reserved_highatomic);
+ }
/*
* Convert to ac->migratetype and avoid the normal
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@lge.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] mm: prevent double decrease of nr_reserved_highatomic
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 14:45:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475819136-24358-3-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475819136-24358-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>
There is race between page freeing and unreserved highatomic.
CPU 0 CPU 1
free_hot_cold_page
mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype
set_pcppage_migratetype(page, mt)
unreserve_highatomic_pageblock
spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock)
move_freepages_block
set_pageblock_migratetype(page)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock)
free_pcppages_bulk
__free_one_page(mt) <- mt is stale
By above race, a page on CPU 0 could go non-highorderatomic free list
since the pageblock's type is changed. By that, unreserve logic of
highorderatomic can decrease reserved count on a same pageblock
several times and then it will make mismatch between
nr_reserved_highatomic and the number of reserved pageblock.
So, this patch verifies whether the pageblock is highatomic or not
and decrease the count only if the pageblock is highatomic.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index e7cbb3cc22fa..d110cd640264 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2133,13 +2133,25 @@ static void unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(const struct alloc_context *ac)
continue;
/*
- * It should never happen but changes to locking could
- * inadvertently allow a per-cpu drain to add pages
- * to MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC while unreserving so be safe
- * and watch for underflows.
+ * In page freeing path, migratetype change is racy so
+ * we can counter several free pages in a pageblock
+ * in this loop althoug we changed the pageblock type
+ * from highatomic to ac->migratetype. So we should
+ * adjust the count once.
*/
- zone->nr_reserved_highatomic -= min(pageblock_nr_pages,
- zone->nr_reserved_highatomic);
+ if (get_pageblock_migratetype(page) ==
+ MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC) {
+ /*
+ * It should never happen but changes to
+ * locking could inadvertently allow a per-cpu
+ * drain to add pages to MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC
+ * while unreserving so be safe and watch for
+ * underflows.
+ */
+ zone->nr_reserved_highatomic -= min(
+ pageblock_nr_pages,
+ zone->nr_reserved_highatomic);
+ }
/*
* Convert to ac->migratetype and avoid the normal
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-07 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-07 5:45 [PATCH 0/4] use up highorder free pages before OOM Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 5:45 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 5:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: adjust reserved highatomic count Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 5:45 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 12:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-07 12:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-07 14:29 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 14:29 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-10 6:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-10 6:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-11 4:19 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-11 4:19 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-11 9:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-11 9:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-12 5:36 ` Mel Gorman
2016-10-12 5:36 ` Mel Gorman
2016-10-07 5:45 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2016-10-07 5:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: prevent double decrease of nr_reserved_highatomic Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 12:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-07 12:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-10-07 14:30 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 14:30 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-12 5:36 ` Mel Gorman
2016-10-12 5:36 ` Mel Gorman
2016-10-07 5:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: unreserve highatomic free pages fully before OOM Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 5:45 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 9:09 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-07 9:09 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-07 14:43 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 14:43 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-10 7:41 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-10 7:41 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-11 5:01 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-11 5:01 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-11 6:50 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-11 6:50 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-11 7:09 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-11 7:09 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-11 7:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-11 7:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-11 7:37 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-11 7:37 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-11 8:01 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-11 8:01 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-07 5:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: skip to reserve pageblock crossed zone boundary for HIGHATOMIC Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 5:45 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 9:16 ` [PATCH 0/4] use up highorder free pages before OOM Michal Hocko
2016-10-07 9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-07 15:04 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-07 15:04 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-10 7:47 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-10 7:47 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-11 5:06 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-11 5:06 ` Minchan Kim
2016-10-11 6:53 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-11 6:53 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1475819136-24358-3-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=sangseok.lee@lge.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.