From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid that SCSI device removal through sysfs triggers a deadlock
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 07:47:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1478267240.3287.8.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96320196-4074-c970-97f0-bffb74713990@sandisk.com>
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 16:27 -0600, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/28/2016 08:08 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > This is a deadlock caused by an inversion issue in kernfs (suicide
> > vs
> > non-suicide removes); so fixing it in SCSI alone really isn't
> > appropriate. I count at least five other subsystems all using this
> > mechanism, so they'll all be similarly affected. It looks to be
> > fairly
> > simply fixable inside kernfs, so please fix it that way.
>
> Hello James,
>
> How about fixing this deadlock with the below patch?
Without a description file, it's a bit hard to follow, but reading the
patch it's somewhat cumbersome and also incomplete: you change the API
for self removal, so every driver that uses the
device_remove_file_self() scheme (about five of them) has to be
changed. I was actually thinking of something much simpler:
You know after
if (device_remove_file_self(dev, attr))
returns true that s_active is held and also that KERNFS_SUICIDAL is set
on the node, so the non-self remove paths can simply check for this
flag and return without descending into __kernfs_remove(), which would
mean they never take s_active. That means we never get the inversion.
This should be about a 10 line patch because there are only two places
this check needs to be done: kernfs_remove() and
kernfs_remove_by_name_ns().
It has the advantage that the api isn't altered so all the other driver
callers simply pick up the benefit.
There may be a bit of back end cleanup to do on the eventual parent
directory removal because I think it needs to wait for all the suicidal
nodes to signal they've finally suicided.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-04 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-26 18:44 [PATCH] Avoid that SCSI device removal through sysfs triggers a deadlock Bart Van Assche
2016-10-27 9:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-10-27 15:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-10-27 9:46 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-10-27 15:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-10-29 0:12 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-10-29 2:08 ` James Bottomley
2016-10-30 19:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-10-30 20:25 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-03 22:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-04 13:47 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-11-04 18:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-07 20:51 ` James Bottomley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-11-08 0:32 Bart Van Assche
2016-11-08 7:01 ` Greg KH
2016-11-08 15:34 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-08 15:28 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-08 16:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-08 18:01 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-08 19:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-11-08 23:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-09 1:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-11-08 23:44 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-09 0:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-11-09 1:43 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-09 2:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-11-11 1:37 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-11 4:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-26 22:25 Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1478267240.3287.8.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.