All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid that SCSI device removal through sysfs triggers a deadlock
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:01:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1478628101.2824.27.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eecdade1-2b35-b877-cb66-6d9c1dc02ddf@sandisk.com>

On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 08:52 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 07:28 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 16:32 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> > > index cf4c636..44ec536 100644
> > > --- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> > > +++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> > > @@ -1410,7 +1410,7 @@ int kernfs_remove_by_name_ns(struct
> > > kernfs_node
> > > *parent, const char *name,
> > >  	mutex_lock(&kernfs_mutex);
> > > 
> > >  	kn = kernfs_find_ns(parent, name, ns);
> > > -	if (kn)
> > > +	if (kn && !(kn->flags & KERNFS_SUICIDED))
> > 
> > Actually, wrong flag, you need KERNFS_SUICIDAL.  The reason is that
> > kernfs_mutex is actually dropped half way through __kernfs_remove, 
> > so KERNFS_SUICIDED is not set atomically with this mutex.
> 
> Hello James,
> 
> Sorry but what you wrote is not correct.

I think you agree it is dropped.  I don't need to add the bit about the
reacquisition because the race is mediated by the first acquisition not
the second one, if you mediate on KERNFS_SUICIDAL, you only need to
worry about this because the mediation is in the first acquisition.  If
you mediate on KERNFS_SUICIDED, you need to explain that the final
thing that means the race can't happen is the unbreak in the sysfs
delete path re-acquiring s_active ... the explanation of what's going
on and why gets about 2x more complex.

James

>  __kernfs_remove() calls kernfs_drain(). That last function not only 
> drops but also reacquires kernfs_mutex. So both KERNFS_SUICIDAL and 
> KERNFS_SUICIDED are set while holding kernfs_mutex.



  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-08 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-08  0:32 [PATCH] Avoid that SCSI device removal through sysfs triggers a deadlock Bart Van Assche
2016-11-08  7:01 ` Greg KH
2016-11-08 15:34   ` James Bottomley
2016-11-08 15:28 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-08 16:52   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-08 18:01     ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-11-08 19:13       ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-11-08 23:33         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-09  1:22           ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-11-08 23:44         ` James Bottomley
2016-11-09  0:57           ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-11-09  1:43             ` James Bottomley
2016-11-09  2:10               ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-11-11  1:37                 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-11  4:13                   ` Eric W. Biederman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-26 22:25 Bart Van Assche
2016-10-26 18:44 Bart Van Assche
2016-10-27  9:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-10-27 15:39   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-10-27  9:46 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-10-27 15:38   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-10-29  0:12     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-10-29  2:08 ` James Bottomley
2016-10-30 19:22   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-10-30 20:25     ` James Bottomley
2016-11-03 22:27   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-04 13:47     ` James Bottomley
2016-11-04 18:17       ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-07 20:51         ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1478628101.2824.27.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.