From: joerg.krause@embedded.rocks (Jörg Krause)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: mmc: core: complete/wait_for_completion performance
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:10:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479669034.1975.1.camel@embedded.rocks> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <187975187.249177.bccdc17e-e9c6-48c2-aeaf-3b81f1b61ec7.open-xchange@email.1und1.de>
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 16:44 +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks> hat am 20. November 2016
> > um 15:42
> > geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 14:28 +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > Hi J?rg,
> > >
> > > > J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks> hat am 20. November
> > > > 2016
> > > > um 13:27
> > > > geschrieben:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I started the discussion on this mailing list in another thread
> > > > [1],
> > > > but I'd like to move it to a new thread, because it might be
> > > > mmc
> > > > specific.
> > > >
> > > > The issue is that I am noticed low wifi network throughput on
> > > > an
> > > > i.MX28
> > > > board with the mainline kernel (v4.7.10, about 6 Mbps) compared
> > > > to
> > > > the
> > > > vendor kernel (Freescale v2.6.35.3, about 20 Mbps). The wifi
> > > > chip
> > > > is
> > > > attached using the SDIO interface.
> > > >
> > > > I started investigation where the bottleneck in the mainline
> > > > kernel?might come from. Therefore I checked that the configs
> > > > and
> > > > settings for the interfaces and drivers are the same. They are.
> > >
> > > so you're not using the mxs_defconfig settings anymore?
> >
> > No, I changed the settings.
> >
>
> What happens to performance to if you change the following settings
> to the same
> like in mxs_defconfig?
>
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
> CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED="noop"
No much change at all. The time difference between complete() and
wait_for_complete() decreases in best case to 110 us, but also varies
to above 130 us.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-20 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-20 12:27 mmc: core: complete/wait_for_completion performance Jörg Krause
2016-11-20 13:28 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-11-20 14:42 ` Jörg Krause
2016-11-20 15:44 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-11-20 19:10 ` Jörg Krause [this message]
2016-11-26 19:10 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-12-07 7:29 ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-07 7:32 ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-07 19:23 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-12-14 9:03 ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-14 18:57 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-12-15 13:50 ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-15 18:51 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-12-16 10:06 ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-26 23:03 ` Stefan Wahren
[not found] ` <1484512950.2026.4.camel@embedded.rocks>
2017-01-15 21:08 ` Stefan Wahren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1479669034.1975.1.camel@embedded.rocks \
--to=joerg.krause@embedded.rocks \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.