All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: joerg.krause@embedded.rocks (Jörg Krause)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: mmc: core: complete/wait_for_completion performance
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 08:32:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481095953.17027.0.camel@embedded.rocks> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1198138554.59982.63209ba1-8fb4-4a13-9ee0-f746a192f4c7.open-xchange@email.1und1.de>

Hit Stefan,

On Sat, 2016-11-26 at 20:10 +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi J?rg,
> 
> > J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks> hat am 20. November 2016
> > um 20:10
> > geschrieben:
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 16:44 +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > > J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks> hat am 20. November
> > > > 2016
> > > > um 15:42
> > > > geschrieben:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Stefan,
> > > > 
> > > > On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 14:28 +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > > > Hi J?rg,
> > > > > 
> > > > > > J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks> hat am 20.
> > > > > > November
> > > > > > 2016
> > > > > > um 13:27
> > > > > > geschrieben:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I started the discussion on this mailing list in another
> > > > > > thread
> > > > > > [1],
> > > > > > but I'd like to move it to a new thread, because it might
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > mmc
> > > > > > specific.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The issue is that I am noticed low wifi network throughput
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > an
> > > > > > i.MX28
> > > > > > board with the mainline kernel (v4.7.10, about 6 Mbps)
> > > > > > compared
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > vendor kernel (Freescale v2.6.35.3, about 20 Mbps). The
> > > > > > wifi
> > > > > > chip
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > attached using the SDIO interface.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I started investigation where the bottleneck in the
> > > > > > mainline
> > > > > > kernel?might come from. Therefore I checked that the
> > > > > > configs
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > settings for the interfaces and drivers are the same. They
> > > > > > are.
> > > > > 
> > > > > so you're not using the mxs_defconfig settings anymore?
> > > > 
> > > > No, I changed the settings.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > What happens to performance to if you change the following
> > > settings
> > > to the same
> > > like in mxs_defconfig?
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
> > > CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED="noop"
> > 
> > No much change at all. The time difference between complete() and
> > wait_for_complete() decreases in best case to 110 us, but also
> > varies
> > to above 130 us.
> 
> just a weird idea. Did you tried to add MMC_CAP_CMD23 into the caps
> [1]?
> 
> [1] - http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> ?v=4.8#L642

I tried, but it did not improved the timing or throughput. However,
many thanks for the input.

J?rg

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-07  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-20 12:27 mmc: core: complete/wait_for_completion performance Jörg Krause
2016-11-20 13:28 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-11-20 14:42   ` Jörg Krause
2016-11-20 15:44     ` Stefan Wahren
2016-11-20 19:10       ` Jörg Krause
2016-11-26 19:10         ` Stefan Wahren
2016-12-07  7:29           ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-07  7:32           ` Jörg Krause [this message]
2016-12-07 19:23             ` Stefan Wahren
2016-12-14  9:03               ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-14 18:57                 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-12-15 13:50                   ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-15 18:51                     ` Stefan Wahren
2016-12-16 10:06                       ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-26 23:03                         ` Stefan Wahren
     [not found]                           ` <1484512950.2026.4.camel@embedded.rocks>
2017-01-15 21:08                             ` Stefan Wahren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1481095953.17027.0.camel@embedded.rocks \
    --to=joerg.krause@embedded.rocks \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.