RfC: MAINTAINERS update for qemu drm drivers.

RfC: MAINTAINERS update for qemu drm drivers.

[Gerd Hoffmann]

  Hi,

I'm busy updating the MAINTAINERS file for the linux kernel, making sure
I'm listed for all qemu drm drivers (cirrus, bochs, qxl, virtio), so
patches land in my inbox.

While being at it:  I'm wondering whenever it makes sense to also
include the qemu-devel list there.  I think it would be useful, so qemu
developers can see what is going on without being subscribed to
dri-devel.

Comments?

thanks,
  Gerd

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Qemu-devel] RfC: MAINTAINERS update for qemu drm drivers.

[Gerd Hoffmann]

  Hi,

I'm busy updating the MAINTAINERS file for the linux kernel, making sure
I'm listed for all qemu drm drivers (cirrus, bochs, qxl, virtio), so
patches land in my inbox.

While being at it:  I'm wondering whenever it makes sense to also
include the qemu-devel list there.  I think it would be useful, so qemu
developers can see what is going on without being subscribed to
dri-devel.

Comments?

thanks,
  Gerd

Re: RfC: MAINTAINERS update for qemu drm drivers.

[Daniel Vetter]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 07:24:34PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
> I'm busy updating the MAINTAINERS file for the linux kernel, making sure
> I'm listed for all qemu drm drivers (cirrus, bochs, qxl, virtio), so
> patches land in my inbox.
> 
> While being at it:  I'm wondering whenever it makes sense to also
> include the qemu-devel list there.  I think it would be useful, so qemu
> developers can see what is going on without being subscribed to
> dri-devel.

Imo makes sense. Also I think one shared git repo for all of them would be
good. Bigger tree means you have more reasons for regular pull requests,
and that means patches land in drm-next faster. Which I think is good. And
I'm a bit on a crusade against boutique trees, for these reasons ;-)
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Qemu-devel] RfC: MAINTAINERS update for qemu drm drivers.

[Daniel Vetter]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 07:24:34PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
> I'm busy updating the MAINTAINERS file for the linux kernel, making sure
> I'm listed for all qemu drm drivers (cirrus, bochs, qxl, virtio), so
> patches land in my inbox.
> 
> While being at it:  I'm wondering whenever it makes sense to also
> include the qemu-devel list there.  I think it would be useful, so qemu
> developers can see what is going on without being subscribed to
> dri-devel.

Imo makes sense. Also I think one shared git repo for all of them would be
good. Bigger tree means you have more reasons for regular pull requests,
and that means patches land in drm-next faster. Which I think is good. And
I'm a bit on a crusade against boutique trees, for these reasons ;-)
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Re: RfC: MAINTAINERS update for qemu drm drivers.

[Gerd Hoffmann]

  Hi,

> Also I think one shared git repo for all of them would be
> good.

Yep, I'm doing that (see today's drm-qemu pull req @ dri-devel).
But, yes, I can place the git repo link in MAINTAINERS too.

cheers,
  Gerd

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Qemu-devel] RfC: MAINTAINERS update for qemu drm drivers.

[Gerd Hoffmann]

  Hi,

> Also I think one shared git repo for all of them would be
> good.

Yep, I'm doing that (see today's drm-qemu pull req @ dri-devel).
But, yes, I can place the git repo link in MAINTAINERS too.

cheers,
  Gerd