From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v4,1/3] drm/i915/gen6+: Clear upper data byte during PCODE write (rev2)
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 16:45:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480689917.17322.12.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161128171526.30701.15805@emeril.freedesktop.org>
On ma, 2016-11-28 at 17:15 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: series starting with [v4,1/3] drm/i915/gen6+: Clear upper data byte during PCODE write (rev2)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16046/
> State : success
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 16046v2 Series without cover letter
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16046/revisions/2/mbox/
I pushed 1/3 to -dinq, thanks for the review. I'll send an updated
version of the other 2, doing the polling first w/o disabling
preemption. According to Art and my tests that should succeed most of
the time, so we'd need the preempt-disabled poll only as a fallback.
> fi-bdw-5557u total:245 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
> fi-bsw-n3050 total:245 pass:205 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40
> fi-bxt-t5700 total:245 pass:217 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
> fi-byt-j1900 total:245 pass:217 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
> fi-byt-n2820 total:245 pass:213 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
> fi-hsw-4770 total:245 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
> fi-hsw-4770r total:245 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
> fi-ilk-650 total:245 pass:192 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:53
> fi-ivb-3520m total:245 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-ivb-3770 total:245 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-kbl-7500u total:245 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-skl-6260u total:245 pass:231 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
> fi-skl-6700hq total:245 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
> fi-skl-6700k total:245 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
> fi-skl-6770hq total:245 pass:231 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
> fi-snb-2520m total:245 pass:213 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
> fi-snb-2600 total:245 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
>
> 477cc06f6ef4842fd63e28ff30d721462af199a6 drm-tip: 2016y-11m-28d-16h-17m-39s UTC integration manifest
> b82f611 drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during SAGV disabling
> 97b0290 drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during CDCLK change notification
> 50aec7a4c drm/i915/gen6+: Clear upper data byte during PCODE write
>
> == Logs ==
>
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3128/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-02 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-28 15:29 [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/i915/gen6+: Clear upper data byte during PCODE write Imre Deak
2016-11-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during CDCLK change notification Imre Deak
2016-11-28 15:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-28 16:12 ` Imre Deak
2016-11-28 16:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v5 " Imre Deak
2016-11-28 17:13 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-28 18:55 ` Imre Deak
2016-11-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during SAGV disabling Imre Deak
2016-11-28 15:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v4,1/3] drm/i915/gen6+: Clear upper data byte during PCODE write Patchwork
2016-11-28 17:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v4,1/3] drm/i915/gen6+: Clear upper data byte during PCODE write (rev2) Patchwork
2016-12-02 14:45 ` Imre Deak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480689917.17322.12.camel@intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.