All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Karsten Keil <isdn@linux-pingi.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	gigaset307x-common@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ser_gigaset: return -ENOMEM on error instead of success
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 21:08:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481144894.11167.7.camel@tiscali.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8eb1f69-e68e-7792-00de-b14e6bac1606@imap.cc>

Hi Tilman,

On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 21:57 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Not much of a mess, I reckon. Everything that has been allocated and
> registered up to that point is properly deallocated and unregistered.
> The code just fails to tell the kernel that module initialization has
> failed, so the module remains loaded even though it can never be
> called because it isn't hooked anywhere. That's a nuisance and a
> waste of RAM, but not much more.

Yes.

But then the removal of the module, which is the only reasonable thing to do
after all this has happened, seems to trigger a WARN in driver_unregister().
And it's that WARN that I think requires the entire stable song and dance.

Otherwise it would be, as far as I can tell, a hard to hit problem in an
obscure driver without any side effects.


Paul Bolle

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Karsten Keil <isdn@linux-pingi.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	gigaset307x-common@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ser_gigaset: return -ENOMEM on error instead of success
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 22:08:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481144894.11167.7.camel@tiscali.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8eb1f69-e68e-7792-00de-b14e6bac1606@imap.cc>

Hi Tilman,

On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 21:57 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Not much of a mess, I reckon. Everything that has been allocated and
> registered up to that point is properly deallocated and unregistered.
> The code just fails to tell the kernel that module initialization has
> failed, so the module remains loaded even though it can never be
> called because it isn't hooked anywhere. That's a nuisance and a
> waste of RAM, but not much more.

Yes.

But then the removal of the module, which is the only reasonable thing to do
after all this has happened, seems to trigger a WARN in driver_unregister().
And it's that WARN that I think requires the entire stable song and dance.

Otherwise it would be, as far as I can tell, a hard to hit problem in an
obscure driver without any side effects.


Paul Bolle

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-07 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-07 11:22 [patch] ser_gigaset: return -ENOMEM on error instead of success Dan Carpenter
2016-12-07 11:22 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-12-07 19:06 ` Paul Bolle
2016-12-07 19:06   ` Paul Bolle
2016-12-07 20:57   ` Tilman Schmidt
2016-12-07 20:57     ` Tilman Schmidt
2016-12-07 21:08     ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2016-12-07 21:08       ` Paul Bolle
2016-12-07 22:04       ` Tilman Schmidt
2016-12-07 22:04         ` Tilman Schmidt
2016-12-09  9:03         ` Paul Bolle
2016-12-09  9:03           ` Paul Bolle
2016-12-08 19:19 ` David Miller
2016-12-08 19:19   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1481144894.11167.7.camel@tiscali.nl \
    --to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gigaset307x-common@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=isdn@linux-pingi.de \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tilman@imap.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.