All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gen9+: Rely on VBT DDI port info for eDP detection
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:34:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1482251654.15809.11.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161220160211.am5fi2sslvcd7m4y@boom>

On ti, 2016-12-20 at 18:02 +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 05:12:49PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > There is at least one APL based system using port A in DP mode
> > (connecting to an on-board DP->VGA adaptor). Atm we'll configure port A
> > unconditionally as eDP which is incorrect in this case. Fix this by
> > relying on the VBT DDI port 'internal port' flag instead on all ports
> > GEN9 onwards. For now chicken out from doing this on earlier DDI
> > platforms too.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h   | 1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c   | 3 +++
> >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index 7e94e506..42fb7e9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -1669,6 +1669,7 @@ struct ddi_vbt_port_info {
> >  	uint8_t supports_dvi:1;
> >  	uint8_t supports_hdmi:1;
> >  	uint8_t supports_dp:1;
> > +	uint8_t supports_edp:1;
> >  
> >  	uint8_t alternate_aux_channel;
> >  	uint8_t alternate_ddc_pin;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> > index 1cf2fa6..60fdd31 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> > @@ -1161,6 +1161,7 @@ static void parse_ddi_port(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port,
> >  	info->supports_dvi = is_dvi;
> >  	info->supports_hdmi = is_hdmi;
> >  	info->supports_dp = is_dp;
> > +	info->supports_edp = is_edp;
> >  
> >  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %c VBT info: DP:%d HDMI:%d DVI:%d EDP:%d CRT:%d\n",
> >  		      port_name(port), is_dp, is_hdmi, is_dvi, is_edp, is_crt);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index d37cb00..7f3f4fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -4983,6 +4983,9 @@ bool intel_dp_is_edp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
> >  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 5)
> >  		return false;
> >  
> > +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
> > +		return dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[port].supports_edp;
> > +
> 
> We already have intel_bios_is_port_edp() that tries to
> discern whether the port is eDP or not.
> 
> Wouldn't that function be usable for this purpose?
> 
> If so, doing:
> 
> if (port == PORT_A && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9)
> 	return true;
> 
> return intel_bios_is_port_edp(dev_priv, port);
> 
> should be enough. If not, maybe it should be fixed instead of
> introducing a new way of doing things.

intel_bios_is_port_edp() does on old platforms what parse_ddi_port()
for DDI platforms. I find it clearer to have all the platform checks in
one place in intel_dp_is_edp() to decide which info to use.

We could move the parsing in intel_bios_is_port_edp() to happen during
the early VBT parsing on old platforms and use the DDI port info for
those too not sure if it's feasible or if it's worth the effort.

--Imre

> 
> >  	if (port == PORT_A)
> >  		return true;
> 
> 
> Kind regards, David
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-20 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-20 15:12 [PATCH] drm/i915/gen9+: Rely on VBT DDI port info for eDP detection Imre Deak
2016-12-20 15:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-12-20 16:02 ` David Weinehall
2016-12-20 16:34   ` Imre Deak [this message]
2016-12-21  8:34     ` Jani Nikula
2016-12-21 10:03       ` Imre Deak
2016-12-20 17:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
2016-12-21 10:17 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915/ddi: " Imre Deak
2016-12-21 11:21   ` Jani Nikula
2016-12-21 11:50     ` Imre Deak
2016-12-21 11:56       ` Jani Nikula
2016-12-22  9:12   ` David Weinehall
2016-12-22 12:28     ` Imre Deak
2016-12-21 10:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/gen9+: Rely on VBT DDI port info for eDP detection (rev2) Patchwork
2016-12-21 12:15   ` Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1482251654.15809.11.camel@intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=david.weinehall@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.