Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ASoC: Intel: rename SND_SST_MFLD_PLATFORM to SND_SST_MID_PLATFORM

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 08:18 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > On 01/02/2017 09:20 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > Rename SND_SST_MFLD_PLATFORM to SND_SST_MID_PLATFORM to make it
> > > > clear that is
> > > > not only about Medfield platform.
> > > 
> > > Does this change make sense? Medfield was a completely different
> > > platform and lumping everything under the same Kconfig option
> > > doesn't seem right to me... Plus we've stopped using 'mid' for
> > > years, no one would know what it stands for. The only clear
> > > architecture feature is the presence of the switch matrix that
> > > uniquely identifies all platforms based on Baytrail, Cherrytrail,
> > > Merrifield and Anniedale. Medfield/Clovertrail did not expose a
> > > switch matrix.
> > 
> > Mea culpa..
> > 
> > So we started this with medfield and the driver construction is
> > pretty much
> > the same untill skylake. So clubbing under mfld bucket made sense to
> > me.
> > 
> > MID is not flavour of the season now.

Would be, though it covers at least few out of them, MFLD just refers to
one.

> > 
> > If anyone comes with a better name, am for that :)

_ATOM ? Sounds too broad...

> 
> SND_SST_HIFI2_MOBILE_PLATFORM ?

Where HIFI2 part came from? Any documentation (maybe internal) available
to look at? (Because it's not obvious to me how all listed above has
something in common)

And I would get rid of _MOBILE part.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy