From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Steven Munroe <munroesj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] powerpc: A new cache shape aux vectors
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 09:18:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1484061523.21117.16.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170110131542.GK28613@gate.crashing.org>
On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 07:15 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:15:35PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > + * For all these fields, a value of 0 means that the information
> > + * is not known.
> > + if (sets == 0)
> > + info->assoc = 0xffff;
> > + else
>
> ...
>
> Is this correct? A fully associative cache should be encoded as sets == 1,
> if there are buggy firmwares that set it to 0 instead it should do the same
> as 1 here I think?
No, I just made a stupid mistake I think. PAPR does say sets=1 is fully
associative which makes sense. Probably a typo.
> Or is 0xffff indicating "unknown" here... But in that
> case the comment above says assoc should be 0 instead.
No it's me.
Cheers,
Ben.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-10 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-04 5:15 [PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Move ARCH_DLINFO out of uapi Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 2/9] powerpc: Move {d, i, u}cache_bsize definitions to a common place Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] powerpc: Remove obsolete comment about patching instructions Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 4/9] powerpc/64: Fix naming of cache block vs. cache line Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 5/9] powerpc/64: Retrieve number of L1 cache sets from device-tree Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 6/9] powerpc/64: Clean up ppc64_caches using a struct per cache Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 7/9] powerpc/64: Add L2 and L3 cache shape info Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 8/9] powerpc/64: Hard code cache geometry on POWER8 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-04 5:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] powerpc: A new cache shape aux vectors Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-04 13:04 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2017-01-04 22:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-05 11:15 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2017-01-10 13:15 ` Segher Boessenkool
2017-01-10 15:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1484061523.21117.16.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=munroesj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.