From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Build failure with v4.9-rc1 and GCC trunk -- compiler weirdness
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 12:34:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485981241.2560.20.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9b_VqhgDQrznZ50zpttmpcV4D4S2mjaxfqxFqud3pMeg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 19:53 +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 1 February 2017 at 19:49, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
[]
> > Or maybe add a BUILD_BUG_ON something like:
> >
> > #define order_base_2(n) \
> > ({ \
> > typeof(n) _n = n; \
> > BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(_n) && _n < 0); \
> > __builtin_constant_p(_n) ? (_n < 2 ? _n : ilog2((_n) - 1) + 1)) \
> > : __order_base_2(_n); \
> > })
> >
>
> This would interfere with the ability to use order_base_2() in
> initializers for global variables.
There aren't any as far as I can tell and would using
order_base_2() for a global initializer make sense?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
james.greenhalgh@arm.com,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: Build failure with v4.9-rc1 and GCC trunk -- compiler weirdness
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 12:34:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485981241.2560.20.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9b_VqhgDQrznZ50zpttmpcV4D4S2mjaxfqxFqud3pMeg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 19:53 +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 1 February 2017 at 19:49, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
[]
> > Or maybe add a BUILD_BUG_ON something like:
> >
> > #define order_base_2(n) \
> > ({ \
> > typeof(n) _n = n; \
> > BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(_n) && _n < 0); \
> > __builtin_constant_p(_n) ? (_n < 2 ? _n : ilog2((_n) - 1) + 1)) \
> > : __order_base_2(_n); \
> > })
> >
>
> This would interfere with the ability to use order_base_2() in
> initializers for global variables.
There aren't any as far as I can tell and would using
order_base_2() for a global initializer make sense?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-01 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-17 18:38 Build failure with v4.9-rc1 and GCC trunk -- compiler weirdness Will Deacon
2016-10-17 18:38 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-17 19:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-17 19:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 13:35 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-19 13:35 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-19 14:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 14:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 15:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 15:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 15:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-19 15:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-19 15:27 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 15:27 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 15:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-19 15:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-19 15:32 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-10-19 15:32 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-10-19 15:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-10-19 15:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-10-19 15:37 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2016-10-19 15:37 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2016-10-19 15:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-19 15:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-19 15:56 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2016-10-19 15:56 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2016-10-19 16:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 16:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-19 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-19 16:22 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-19 16:22 ` Will Deacon
2017-02-01 16:58 ` Laura Abbott
2017-02-01 16:58 ` Laura Abbott
2017-02-01 17:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 17:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 18:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 18:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 19:04 ` Joe Perches
2017-02-01 19:04 ` Joe Perches
2017-02-01 19:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 19:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 19:49 ` Joe Perches
2017-02-01 19:49 ` Joe Perches
2017-02-01 19:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 19:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 20:34 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-02-01 20:34 ` Joe Perches
2017-02-01 21:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 21:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-02 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-02 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-01 21:50 ` Laura Abbott
2017-02-01 21:50 ` Laura Abbott
2017-02-02 9:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-02 9:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-02 15:43 ` Laura Abbott
2017-02-02 15:43 ` Laura Abbott
2017-02-02 15:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-02 15:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1485981241.2560.20.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.