All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [kernel-hardening] [RFC PATCH 3/4] integrity: mark default IMA rules as __ro_after_init
@ 2017-02-13  5:34 James Morris
  2017-02-14  1:45 ` [kernel-hardening] " Mimi Zohar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Morris @ 2017-02-13  5:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-security-module; +Cc: kernel-hardening, Mimi Zohar

The default IMA rules are loaded during init and then do not
change, so mark them as __ro_after_init.

Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index aed47b7..e8498a3 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
  * normal users can easily run the machine out of memory simply building
  * and running executables.
  */
-static struct ima_rule_entry dont_measure_rules[] = {
+static struct ima_rule_entry dont_measure_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
 	{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = PROC_SUPER_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
 	{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = SYSFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
 	{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = DEBUGFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
 	{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = NSFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC}
 };
 
-static struct ima_rule_entry original_measurement_rules[] = {
+static struct ima_rule_entry original_measurement_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
 	{.action = MEASURE, .func = MMAP_CHECK, .mask = MAY_EXEC,
 	 .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_MASK},
 	{.action = MEASURE, .func = BPRM_CHECK, .mask = MAY_EXEC,
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
 	{.action = MEASURE, .func = FIRMWARE_CHECK, .flags = IMA_FUNC},
 };
 
-static struct ima_rule_entry default_measurement_rules[] = {
+static struct ima_rule_entry default_measurement_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
 	{.action = MEASURE, .func = MMAP_CHECK, .mask = MAY_EXEC,
 	 .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_MASK},
 	{.action = MEASURE, .func = BPRM_CHECK, .mask = MAY_EXEC,
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
 	{.action = MEASURE, .func = POLICY_CHECK, .flags = IMA_FUNC},
 };
 
-static struct ima_rule_entry default_appraise_rules[] = {
+static struct ima_rule_entry default_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
 	{.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = PROC_SUPER_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
 	{.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = SYSFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
 	{.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = DEBUGFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
-- 
1.7.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] integrity: mark default IMA rules as __ro_after_init
  2017-02-13  5:34 [kernel-hardening] [RFC PATCH 3/4] integrity: mark default IMA rules as __ro_after_init James Morris
@ 2017-02-14  1:45 ` Mimi Zohar
  2017-02-14 10:38   ` James Morris
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mimi Zohar @ 2017-02-14  1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Morris; +Cc: linux-security-module, kernel-hardening

On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 16:34 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> The default IMA rules are loaded during init and then do not
> change, so mark them as __ro_after_init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>

Thanks!

Mimi

> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index aed47b7..e8498a3 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
>   * normal users can easily run the machine out of memory simply building
>   * and running executables.
>   */
> -static struct ima_rule_entry dont_measure_rules[] = {
> +static struct ima_rule_entry dont_measure_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
>  	{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = PROC_SUPER_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
>  	{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = SYSFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
>  	{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = DEBUGFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
>  	{.action = DONT_MEASURE, .fsmagic = NSFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC}
>  };
> 
> -static struct ima_rule_entry original_measurement_rules[] = {
> +static struct ima_rule_entry original_measurement_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
>  	{.action = MEASURE, .func = MMAP_CHECK, .mask = MAY_EXEC,
>  	 .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_MASK},
>  	{.action = MEASURE, .func = BPRM_CHECK, .mask = MAY_EXEC,
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
>  	{.action = MEASURE, .func = FIRMWARE_CHECK, .flags = IMA_FUNC},
>  };
> 
> -static struct ima_rule_entry default_measurement_rules[] = {
> +static struct ima_rule_entry default_measurement_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
>  	{.action = MEASURE, .func = MMAP_CHECK, .mask = MAY_EXEC,
>  	 .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_MASK},
>  	{.action = MEASURE, .func = BPRM_CHECK, .mask = MAY_EXEC,
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
>  	{.action = MEASURE, .func = POLICY_CHECK, .flags = IMA_FUNC},
>  };
> 
> -static struct ima_rule_entry default_appraise_rules[] = {
> +static struct ima_rule_entry default_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
>  	{.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = PROC_SUPER_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
>  	{.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = SYSFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
>  	{.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = DEBUGFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] integrity: mark default IMA rules as __ro_after_init
  2017-02-14  1:45 ` [kernel-hardening] " Mimi Zohar
@ 2017-02-14 10:38   ` James Morris
  2017-02-15  5:58     ` Mimi Zohar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Morris @ 2017-02-14 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mimi Zohar; +Cc: linux-security-module, kernel-hardening

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Mimi Zohar wrote:

> On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 16:34 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> > The default IMA rules are loaded during init and then do not
> > change, so mark them as __ro_after_init.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
> 
> Thanks!

Is that an acked-by?


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] integrity: mark default IMA rules as __ro_after_init
  2017-02-14 10:38   ` James Morris
@ 2017-02-15  5:58     ` Mimi Zohar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mimi Zohar @ 2017-02-15  5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Morris; +Cc: linux-security-module, kernel-hardening

On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 21:38 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 16:34 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> > > The default IMA rules are loaded during init and then do not
> > > change, so mark them as __ro_after_init.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Thanks!
> 
> Is that an acked-by?

Yes, thanks.

Mimi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-15  5:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-13  5:34 [kernel-hardening] [RFC PATCH 3/4] integrity: mark default IMA rules as __ro_after_init James Morris
2017-02-14  1:45 ` [kernel-hardening] " Mimi Zohar
2017-02-14 10:38   ` James Morris
2017-02-15  5:58     ` Mimi Zohar

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.