From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "jsmart2021@gmail.com" <jsmart2021@gmail.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: Broadcom (Emulex) FC Target driver - efct
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:10:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1489709408.2574.26.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ced2ff0a-05ee-b85e-b41a-f912cab9e267@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 15:28 -0800, James Smart wrote:
> I'd like to announce the availability of the Broadcom (Emulex) FC Target
> driver - efct.
Hello James,
Sorry but I have not yet had the time to do a full review. But I would like
to already share the following feedback:
* efct_io_find_tgt_io() looks up an I/O request in a list. The lookup is
protected by a spinlock but callers are expected to increase the I/O
request reference count after the lock has been released. This looks wrong
to me and most likely means that there are race conditions related to I/O
request lookup. Have you considered to move the kref_get() call into
efct_io_find_tgt_io() such that it can occur with the spinlock held?
* If an ABTS is received then efct_process_abts() (indirectly) calls
target_submit_tmr(). That last function may or may not decide to call
efct_lio_queue_status(), depending on whether or not the TAS bit has been
set. efct_lio_queue_status() sends back a SCSI response to the initiator
(see also __transport_check_aborted_status() and
transport_send_task_abort()). Is it allowed by the FC spec to send back a
SCSI response after an ABTS has been received? Is that SCSI response sent
before or after the BLS ABTS response?
Thanks,
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-17 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-27 23:28 [ANNOUNCE]: Broadcom (Emulex) FC Target driver - efct James Smart
2017-02-28 16:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-28 18:14 ` James Smart
2017-03-01 9:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-03-02 20:08 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-03-05 16:35 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2017-03-06 17:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-16 19:59 ` Roland Dreier
2017-06-12 23:08 ` James Smart
2017-06-13 6:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-13 8:29 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-06-13 15:34 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-06-14 11:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-06-14 20:02 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2017-06-16 6:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-03-17 0:10 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1489709408.2574.26.camel@sandisk.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=jsmart2021@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.