From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"longli@exchange.microsoft.com" <longli@exchange.microsoft.com>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "sthemmin@microsoft.com" <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
"kys@microsoft.com" <kys@microsoft.com>,
"longli@microsoft.com" <longli@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block-mq: set both block queue and hardware queue restart bit for restart
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 00:32:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491438735.2787.18.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491437781-3565-1-git-send-email-longli@exchange.microsoft.com>
On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 17:16 -0700, Long Li wrote:
> Under heavy I/O, one hardware queue may be unable to dispatch any I/O to =
the=20
> device layer. This poses a problem with restarting this hardware queue on=
I/O
> finish in blk_mq_sched_restart_queues(), becaue there is nothing pending =
that
> will finish in future on this hardware qeueu. This will result in deadloc=
k.
>=20
> With this patch, we check for all possible stalled hardware queues when I=
/O
> finishes on any hardware queues. This prevents this deadlock.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> index 09af8ff..f7f3d44 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_=
ctx *hctx)
> * needing a restart in that case.
> */
> if (!list_empty(&rq_list)) {
> - blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
> + blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_queue(hctx);
> did_work =3D blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(hctx, &rq_list);
> } else if (!has_sched_dispatch) {
> blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &rq_list);
Please drop this patch. I'm working on a better solution.
Thanks,
Bart.=
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"longli@exchange.microsoft.com" <longli@exchange.microsoft.com>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "sthemmin@microsoft.com" <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
"kys@microsoft.com" <kys@microsoft.com>,
"longli@microsoft.com" <longli@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block-mq: set both block queue and hardware queue restart bit for restart
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 00:32:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491438735.2787.18.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491437781-3565-1-git-send-email-longli@exchange.microsoft.com>
On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 17:16 -0700, Long Li wrote:
> Under heavy I/O, one hardware queue may be unable to dispatch any I/O to the
> device layer. This poses a problem with restarting this hardware queue on I/O
> finish in blk_mq_sched_restart_queues(), becaue there is nothing pending that
> will finish in future on this hardware qeueu. This will result in deadlock.
>
> With this patch, we check for all possible stalled hardware queues when I/O
> finishes on any hardware queues. This prevents this deadlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> index 09af8ff..f7f3d44 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> * needing a restart in that case.
> */
> if (!list_empty(&rq_list)) {
> - blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
> + blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_queue(hctx);
> did_work = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(hctx, &rq_list);
> } else if (!has_sched_dispatch) {
> blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &rq_list);
Please drop this patch. I'm working on a better solution.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-06 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-06 0:16 [PATCH] block-mq: set both block queue and hardware queue restart bit for restart Long Li
2017-04-06 0:32 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-04-06 0:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-06 3:38 ` Long Li
2017-04-06 3:38 ` Long Li
2017-04-06 3:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-06 3:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-06 4:21 ` KY Srinivasan
2017-04-06 4:21 ` KY Srinivasan
2017-04-06 5:38 ` Long Li
2017-04-06 5:38 ` Long Li
2017-04-10 23:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 23:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-13 23:12 ` Long Li
2017-04-13 23:12 ` Long Li
2017-05-05 8:58 ` Long Li
2017-05-05 8:58 ` Long Li
2017-05-05 19:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-05 19:52 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491438735.2787.18.camel@sandisk.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@exchange.microsoft.com \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.