All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
	"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"osandov@fb.com" <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: use hw tag for scheduling if hw tag space is big enough
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:11:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493410261.2767.19.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8984e2a-ecdc-fdf7-afba-484b823270c9@fb.com>

On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 12:22 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 04/28/2017 09:15 AM, Ming Lei wrote: =20
> > +/*
> > + * If this queue has enough hardware tags and doesn't share tags with
> > + * other queues, just use hw tag directly for scheduling.
> > + */
> > +static inline bool blk_mq_sched_may_use_hw_tag(struct request_queue *q=
)
> > +{
> > +	if (q->tag_set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	if (blk_mq_get_queue_depth(q) < q->nr_requests)
> > +		return false;
>=20
> I think we should leave a bigger gap. Ideally, for scheduling, we should
> have a hw queue depth that's around half of what the scheduler has to
> work with. That will always leave us something to schedule with, if the
> hw can't deplete the whole pool.

Hello Jens,

The scsi-mq core allocates exactly the same number of tags per hardware
queue as the SCSI queue depth. Requiring that there is a gap would cause
BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG not to be enabled for any scsi-mq LLD. I'm not
sure that changing the tag allocation strategy in scsi-mq would be the best
solution. How about changing blk_mq_sched_may_use_hw_tag() into something
like the below to guarantee that the scheduler has sufficient tags availabl=
e?

static bool blk_mq_sched_may_use_hw_tag(struct request_queue *q)
{
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 return=A0blk_mq_get_queue_depth(q) >=3D max(q->nr_req=
uests, 16);
}

Thanks,

Bart.=

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-28 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-28 15:15 [PATCH 0/4] blk-mq: support to use hw tag for scheduling Ming Lei
2017-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] blk-mq: introduce BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:21   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 16:46   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 20:13     ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 21:40       ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-04  2:01         ` Ming Lei
2017-05-04  2:13           ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-04  2:51             ` Ming Lei
2017-05-04 14:06               ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-05 22:54                 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-05 22:54                   ` Ming Lei
2017-05-05 23:33                   ` Ming Lei
2017-05-05 23:33                     ` Ming Lei
2017-05-10  7:25                 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_get_queue_depth() Ming Lei
2017-04-28 18:23   ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-29  9:55     ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:55   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-04  2:10     ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: use hw tag for scheduling if hw tag space is big enough Ming Lei
2017-04-28 18:09   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-29 10:35     ` Ming Lei
2017-05-01 15:06       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-02  3:49         ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-02  8:46         ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 18:22   ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-28 20:11     ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-04-29 10:59     ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:29   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 16:55     ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 17:00       ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 17:33         ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: dump new introduced flag of BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG Ming Lei
2017-04-28 18:10   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-29 11:00     ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 20:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] blk-mq: support to use hw tag for scheduling Jens Axboe
2017-05-03  4:03   ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 14:08     ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 14:10       ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 15:03         ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 15:08           ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 15:38             ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:06               ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 16:21                 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:52               ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 17:03                 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 17:07                   ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 17:15                     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-03 17:24                       ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 17:35                         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-03 17:40                           ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 17:43                             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-03 17:08                 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-03 17:11                   ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 17:19                   ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 17:41                     ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1493410261.2767.19.camel@sandisk.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.