From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: use hw tag for scheduling if hw tag space is big enough
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 18:59:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170429105910.GD12421@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8984e2a-ecdc-fdf7-afba-484b823270c9@fb.com>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:22:45PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 04/28/2017 09:15 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * If this queue has enough hardware tags and doesn't share tags with
> > + * other queues, just use hw tag directly for scheduling.
> > + */
> > +static inline bool blk_mq_sched_may_use_hw_tag(struct request_queue *q)
> > +{
> > + if (q->tag_set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if (blk_mq_get_queue_depth(q) < q->nr_requests)
> > + return false;
>
> I think we should leave a bigger gap. Ideally, for scheduling, we should
> have a hw queue depth that's around half of what the scheduler has to
> work with. That will always leave us something to schedule with, if the
> hw can't deplete the whole pool.
When .sched_tags and .tags are different, it makes sense to make
nr_requests to be two times of queue_depth.
When we switch to schedule with hw tags directly, the euquation
can't be true at all. The simple policy in this patch can't be worsen
than standalone .sched_tags because lifetime of one sched tag is
actually same with request(from its allocation<io submission> to
freeing<io completion>). When we have bigger queue depth, even we can
schedule more.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-29 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-28 15:15 [PATCH 0/4] blk-mq: support to use hw tag for scheduling Ming Lei
2017-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] blk-mq: introduce BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:21 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 16:46 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 20:13 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 21:40 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-04 2:01 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-04 2:13 ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-04 2:51 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-04 14:06 ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-05 22:54 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-05 22:54 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-05 23:33 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-05 23:33 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-10 7:25 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_get_queue_depth() Ming Lei
2017-04-28 18:23 ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-29 9:55 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:55 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-04 2:10 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: use hw tag for scheduling if hw tag space is big enough Ming Lei
2017-04-28 18:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-29 10:35 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-01 15:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-02 3:49 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-02 8:46 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 18:22 ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-28 20:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-29 10:59 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-05-03 16:29 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 16:55 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 17:00 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 17:33 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 15:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: dump new introduced flag of BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG Ming Lei
2017-04-28 18:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-29 11:00 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-28 20:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] blk-mq: support to use hw tag for scheduling Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 4:03 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 14:08 ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 14:10 ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 15:03 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 15:08 ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 15:38 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:06 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-05-03 16:21 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 16:52 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 17:03 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 17:07 ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 17:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-03 17:24 ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 17:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-03 17:40 ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 17:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-03 17:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-03 17:11 ` Jens Axboe
2017-05-03 17:19 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-03 17:41 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170429105910.GD12421@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.