* [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait for struct_mutex inside shrinker
@ 2017-05-24 10:11 Chris Wilson
2017-05-24 10:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-05-29 11:55 ` [PATCH] " Joonas Lahtinen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-05-24 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Having resolved whether or not we would deadlock upon a call to
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex), we can then wait for the contended
struct_mutex if we are not the owner. This should significantly improve
the chance of running the shrinker for other processes whilst the GPU is
busy.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
index b409e67c5c72..03e08e1853e6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ static bool shrinker_lock(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool *unlock)
{
switch (mutex_trylock_recursive(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex)) {
case MUTEX_TRYLOCK_FAILED:
- return false;
-
+ if (mutex_lock_killable(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex))
+ return false;
case MUTEX_TRYLOCK_SUCCESS:
*unlock = true;
return true;
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Wait for struct_mutex inside shrinker
2017-05-24 10:11 [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait for struct_mutex inside shrinker Chris Wilson
@ 2017-05-24 10:30 ` Patchwork
2017-05-29 11:55 ` [PATCH] " Joonas Lahtinen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-05-24 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Wait for struct_mutex inside shrinker
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/24870/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 24870v1 drm/i915: Wait for struct_mutex inside shrinker
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/24870/revisions/1/mbox/
Test gem_exec_suspend:
Subgroup basic-s4-devices:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100125
fdo#100125 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100125
fi-bdw-5557u total:278 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:11 time:439s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:278 pass:256 dwarn:8 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14 time:436s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:278 pass:242 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:36 time:577s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:278 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:516s
fi-byt-j1900 total:278 pass:254 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:489s
fi-byt-n2820 total:278 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:481s
fi-hsw-4770 total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 time:419s
fi-hsw-4770r total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 time:410s
fi-ilk-650 total:278 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:50 time:420s
fi-ivb-3520m total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time:493s
fi-ivb-3770 total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time:465s
fi-kbl-7500u total:278 pass:255 dwarn:5 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time:468s
fi-kbl-7560u total:278 pass:263 dwarn:5 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time:566s
fi-skl-6260u total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time:457s
fi-skl-6700hq total:278 pass:239 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:17 skip:21 time:436s
fi-skl-6700k total:278 pass:256 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time:465s
fi-skl-6770hq total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time:498s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:278 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13 time:439s
fi-snb-2520m total:278 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:534s
fi-snb-2600 total:278 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:400s
c8f2238b9cbfef358e61596cd49b1f648c85811e drm-tip: 2017y-05m-24d-08h-04m-41s UTC integration manifest
3fd5e80 drm/i915: Wait for struct_mutex inside shrinker
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_4799/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait for struct_mutex inside shrinker
2017-05-24 10:11 [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait for struct_mutex inside shrinker Chris Wilson
2017-05-24 10:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-05-29 11:55 ` Joonas Lahtinen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-05-29 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
On ke, 2017-05-24 at 11:11 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Having resolved whether or not we would deadlock upon a call to
> mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex), we can then wait for the contended
> struct_mutex if we are not the owner. This should significantly improve
> the chance of running the shrinker for other processes whilst the GPU is
> busy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-29 11:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-24 10:11 [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait for struct_mutex inside shrinker Chris Wilson
2017-05-24 10:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-05-29 11:55 ` [PATCH] " Joonas Lahtinen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.