Re: [PATCH] sh-pfc: handle pin array holes in sh_pfc_map_pins()

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

Hi Linus,

On Friday 06 March 2015 11:43:45 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > The  pin array handled by sh_pfc_map_pins() may contain holes representing
> > non- existing pins. We have to first count the valid pins in order to
> > calculate the size  of the memory to be allocated, then to skip over the
> > non-existing pins when  initializing the allocated arrays, and then to
> > return the number of valid pins  from sh_pfc_map_pins() instead of 0 on
> > success.
> > 
> > As we have to touch devm_kzalloc() calls anyway, use more fitting
> > devm_kcalloc() instead which additionally checks the array size. And
> > since PINMUX_TYPE_NONE is #define'd as 0, stop re-initializing already
> > zeroed out 'pmx->configs' array.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > The patch is against the 'devel' branch of Linus W.'s 'linux-pinctrl.git'
> > repo. This patch should be applied before my R8A7794 PFC support patch
> > and before Laurent's patches removing non-existent GPIOs for R8A779[01],
> > otherwise they would cause the kernel  to hang while booting!
> 
> OK not applying this until ACKed by Laurent,
> and in the meantime I'm taking the three applied R8A7794 patches
> out of my tree again.

Could you also drop "pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790: Remove non existing GPIO pins" 
and "pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7791: Remove non existing GPIO pins" for the same 
reason ? Sorry for the trouble.

> Can you please send these depending patches as a series with this
> patch as 1/4 and the three R8A7794 patches as 2,3,4/4? Thanks.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart