Re: [For 4.9] Updating https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Release_Features to reflect support status of new features

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1038 bytes --]

On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 13:04 +0200, Lars Kurth wrote:
> > On 06/27/2017 12:33 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > > == On A / B: I think we should add ==
> > > > - Resource Management > Null Scheduler : tech preview or
> > > > experimental
> > > 
> > > I think that the interface is probably in a final form, the code
> > > is
> > > complete, and there are no known bugs or issues; so I'd say tech
> > > preview.
> > > 
I agree. There's potential for new features and improvement, like
supporting soft-affinity (not for scheduling, as all is static, but for
NUMA placement reasons) and/or introducing tracing in there.

But all are the kind of improvement that happens even for supported
features.

> > > Dario, any opinions?
>
I think Tech Preview is ok.

Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel