From: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: Fix reacquisition of volume cookie on still-live connection
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 13:07:24 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14e66691a65e3d05d3d8d50e74dfb366@manguebit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3756406.1712244064@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Hi Dave,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> writes:
> During mount, cifs_mount_get_tcon() gets a tcon resource connection record
> and then attaches an fscache volume cookie to it. However, it does this
> irrespective of whether or not the tcon returned from cifs_get_tcon() is a
> new record or one that's already in use. This leads to a warning about a
> volume cookie collision and a leaked volume cookie because tcon->fscache
> gets reset.
>
> Fix this be adding a mutex and a "we've already tried this" flag and only
> doing it once for the lifetime of the tcon.
Can't we just move the cookie acquisition to cifs_get_tcon() before it
gets added to list @ses->tcon_list. This way we'll guarantee that the
cookie is set only once for the new tcon.
Besides, do we want to share a tcon with two different superblocks that
have 'fsc' and 'nofsc', respectively? If not, it would be better to fix
match_tcon() as well to handle such case.
> [!] Note: Looking at cifs_mount_get_tcon(), a more general solution may
> actually be required. Reacquiring the volume cookie isn't the only thing
> that function does: it also partially reinitialises the tcon record without
> any locking - which may cause live filesystem ops already using the tcon
> through a previous mount to malfunction.
Agreed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 15:21 [PATCH] cifs: Fix reacquisition of volume cookie on still-live connection David Howells
2024-04-04 16:07 ` Paulo Alcantara [this message]
2024-04-16 16:58 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 14:09 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-17 14:38 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 18:59 ` Tom Talpey
2024-04-18 13:32 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 21:25 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-18 13:43 ` David Howells
2024-04-19 20:04 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-17 13:41 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14e66691a65e3d05d3d8d50e74dfb366@manguebit.com \
--to=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.