From: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: Fix reacquisition of volume cookie on still-live connection
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:25:19 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59c322dc49c3cc76a4b6a2de35106c61@manguebit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <277920.1713364693@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> writes:
> Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com> wrote:
>
>> Consider the following example where a tcon is reused from different
>> CIFS superblocks:
>>
>> mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o ${opts} # new super, new tcon
>> mount.cifs //srv/share/dir /mnt/2 -o ${opts} # new super, reused tcon
>>
>> So, /mnt/1/dir/foo and /mnt/2/foo will lead to different inodes.
>>
>> The two mounts are accessing the same tcon (\\srv\share) but the new
>> superblock was created because the prefix path "\dir" didn't match in
>> cifs_match_super(). Trust me, that's a very common scenario.
>
> Why does it need to lead to a different superblock, assuming ${opts} is the
> same in both cases? Can we not do as NFS does and share the superblock,
> walking during the mount process through the directory prefix to the root
> object?
I don't know why it was designed that way, but the reason we have two
different superblocks with ${opts} being the same is because cifs.ko
relies on the value of cifs_sb_info::prepath to build paths out of
dentries. See build_path_from_dentry(). So, when you access
/mnt/2/foo, cifs.ko will build a path like '[optional tree name prefix]
+ cifs_sb_info::prepath + \foo' and then reuse connections
(server+session+tcon) from first superblock to perform I/O on that file.
> In other words, why does:
>
> mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o ${opts}
> mount.cifs //srv/share/dir /mnt/2 -o ${opts}
>
> give you a different result to:
>
> mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o ${opts}
> mount --bind /mnt/1/dir /mnt/2
Honestly, I don't know how bind works at VFS level. I see that the new
superblock isn't created and when I access /mnt/2/foo,
build_path_from_dentry() correctly returns '\dir\foo'.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 15:21 [PATCH] cifs: Fix reacquisition of volume cookie on still-live connection David Howells
2024-04-04 16:07 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-16 16:58 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 14:09 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-17 14:38 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 18:59 ` Tom Talpey
2024-04-18 13:32 ` David Howells
2024-04-17 21:25 ` Paulo Alcantara [this message]
2024-04-18 13:43 ` David Howells
2024-04-19 20:04 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-04-17 13:41 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59c322dc49c3cc76a4b6a2de35106c61@manguebit.com \
--to=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.