Patch "clk/samsung: exynos542x: mark some clocks as critical" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

Patch "clk/samsung: exynos542x: mark some clocks as critical" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

[gregkh]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    clk/samsung: exynos542x: mark some clocks as critical

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     clk-samsung-exynos542x-mark-some-clocks-as-critical.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Wed Aug  9 10:32:06 PDT 2017
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:44:30 +0100
Subject: clk/samsung: exynos542x: mark some clocks as critical

From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>


[ Upstream commit 318fa46cc60d37fec1e87dbf03a82aca0f5ce695 ]

Some parent clocks of the Exynos542x clock blocks, which have separate
power domains (like DISP, MFC, MSC, GSC, FSYS and G2D) must be always
enabled to access any register related to power management unit or devices
connected to it. For the time being, until a proper solution based on
runtime PM is applied, mark those clocks as critical (instead of ignore
unused or even no flags) to prevent disabling them.

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> [Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static const struct samsung_gate_clock e
 	GATE(CLK_ACLK550_CAM, "aclk550_cam", "mout_user_aclk550_cam",
 				GATE_BUS_TOP, 24, 0, 0),
 	GATE(CLK_ACLK432_SCALER, "aclk432_scaler", "mout_user_aclk432_scaler",
-				GATE_BUS_TOP, 27, 0, 0),
+				GATE_BUS_TOP, 27, CLK_IS_CRITICAL, 0),
 };
 
 static const struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5420_mux_clks[] __initconst = {
@@ -956,20 +956,20 @@ static const struct samsung_gate_clock e
 	GATE(CLK_SMMU_G2D, "smmu_g2d", "aclk333_g2d", GATE_IP_G2D, 7, 0, 0),
 
 	GATE(0, "aclk200_fsys", "mout_user_aclk200_fsys",
-			GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 9, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
+			GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 9, CLK_IS_CRITICAL, 0),
 	GATE(0, "aclk200_fsys2", "mout_user_aclk200_fsys2",
 			GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 10, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
 
 	GATE(0, "aclk333_g2d", "mout_user_aclk333_g2d",
 			GATE_BUS_TOP, 0, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
 	GATE(0, "aclk266_g2d", "mout_user_aclk266_g2d",
-			GATE_BUS_TOP, 1, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
+			GATE_BUS_TOP, 1, CLK_IS_CRITICAL, 0),
 	GATE(0, "aclk300_jpeg", "mout_user_aclk300_jpeg",
 			GATE_BUS_TOP, 4, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
 	GATE(0, "aclk333_432_isp0", "mout_user_aclk333_432_isp0",
 			GATE_BUS_TOP, 5, 0, 0),
 	GATE(0, "aclk300_gscl", "mout_user_aclk300_gscl",
-			GATE_BUS_TOP, 6, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
+			GATE_BUS_TOP, 6, CLK_IS_CRITICAL, 0),
 	GATE(0, "aclk333_432_gscl", "mout_user_aclk333_432_gscl",
 			GATE_BUS_TOP, 7, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
 	GATE(0, "aclk333_432_isp", "mout_user_aclk333_432_isp",
@@ -983,20 +983,20 @@ static const struct samsung_gate_clock e
 	GATE(0, "aclk166", "mout_user_aclk166",
 			GATE_BUS_TOP, 14, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
 	GATE(CLK_ACLK333, "aclk333", "mout_user_aclk333",
-			GATE_BUS_TOP, 15, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
+			GATE_BUS_TOP, 15, CLK_IS_CRITICAL, 0),
 	GATE(0, "aclk400_isp", "mout_user_aclk400_isp",
 			GATE_BUS_TOP, 16, 0, 0),
 	GATE(0, "aclk400_mscl", "mout_user_aclk400_mscl",
 			GATE_BUS_TOP, 17, 0, 0),
 	GATE(0, "aclk200_disp1", "mout_user_aclk200_disp1",
-			GATE_BUS_TOP, 18, 0, 0),
+			GATE_BUS_TOP, 18, CLK_IS_CRITICAL, 0),
 	GATE(CLK_SCLK_MPHY_IXTAL24, "sclk_mphy_ixtal24", "mphy_refclk_ixtal24",
 			GATE_BUS_TOP, 28, 0, 0),
 	GATE(CLK_SCLK_HSIC_12M, "sclk_hsic_12m", "ff_hsic_12m",
 			GATE_BUS_TOP, 29, 0, 0),
 
 	GATE(0, "aclk300_disp1", "mout_user_aclk300_disp1",
-			SRC_MASK_TOP2, 24, 0, 0),
+			SRC_MASK_TOP2, 24, CLK_IS_CRITICAL, 0),
 
 	GATE(CLK_MAU_EPLL, "mau_epll", "mout_mau_epll_clk",
 			SRC_MASK_TOP7, 20, 0, 0),


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from m.szyprowski@samsung.com are

queue-4.9/clk-samsung-exynos542x-mark-some-clocks-as-critical.patch