All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	mario.limonciello@dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI / Sleep: Check low power idle constraints for debug only
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 08:59:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502553556.20268.47.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18796717.B6iU8dePCh@aspire.rjw.lan>

On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 16:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]

> > +
> > +struct lpi_constraints {
> > +	char *name;
> > +	int min_dstate;
> If you store the handle here as well, you won't need to
> look it up every time _check_constraints() is called.

The reason I didn't keep handle here, I thought handle can be stale or
change for PnP device on plug in and out. Is this not true?

> > 
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct lpi_constraints *lpi_constraints_table;
> > +static int lpi_constraints_table_size;
> > +
> > +static void lpi_device_get_constraints(void)
> > +{
> > +	union acpi_object *out_obj;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(lps0_device_handle,
> > &lps0_dsm_guid,
> > +					  1,
> > ACPI_LPS0_GET_DEVICE_CONSTRAINTS,
> > +					  NULL,
> > ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
> > +
> > +	acpi_handle_debug(lps0_device_handle, "_DSM function 1
> > eval %s\n",
> > +			  out_obj ? "successful" : "failed");
> > +
> > +	if (!out_obj)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	lpi_constraints_table = kcalloc(out_obj->package.count,
> > +					sizeof(*lpi_constraints_ta
> > ble),
> > +					GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!lpi_constraints_table)
> > +		goto free_acpi_buffer;
> > +
> > +	pr_debug("LPI: constraints dump begin\n");
> Please add an empty line after this.  Also something like
> "constraints
> list begin" would sound better IMO.
> 
OK.

> > 
> > +	for (i = 0; i < out_obj->package.count; i++) {
> > +		union acpi_object *package = &out_obj-
> > >package.elements[i];
> > +		struct lpi_device_info info = { };
> > +		int package_count = 0, j;
> > +
> > +		if (!package)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; ++j) {
> > +			union acpi_object *element =
> > +					&(package-
> > >package.elements[j]);
> > +
> > +			switch (element->type) {
> > +			case ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER:
> > +				info.enabled = element-
> > >integer.value;
> > +				break;
> > +			case ACPI_TYPE_STRING:
> > +				info.name = element-
> > >string.pointer;
> > +				break;
> > +			case ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE:
> > +				package_count = element-
> > >package.count;
> > +				info.package = element-
> > >package.elements;
> > +				break;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (!info.enabled || !info.package || !info.name)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> I would evaluate acpi_get_handle() here and store the handle in the
> constraints table (if persent).  And you can skip the entry
> altogether
> if not present, because you won't be printing it anyway.
> 
> > 
> > +		lpi_constraints_table[lpi_constraints_table_size].
> > name =
> > +						kstrdup(info.name,
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		if
> > (!lpi_constraints_table[lpi_constraints_table_size].name)
> > +			goto free_constraints;
> > +
> > +		pr_debug("index:%d Name:%s\n", i, info.name);
> > +
> > +		for (j = 0; j < package_count; ++j) {
> > +			union acpi_object *info_obj =
> > &info.package[j];
> > +			union acpi_object *cnstr_pkg;
> > +			union acpi_object *obj;
> > +			struct lpi_device_constraint dev_info;
> > +
> > +			switch (info_obj->type) {
> > +			case ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER:
> > +				/* version */
> > +				break;
> > +			case ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE:
> > +				if (info_obj->package.count < 2)
> > +					break;
> > +
> > +				cnstr_pkg = info_obj-
> > >package.elements;
> > +				obj = &cnstr_pkg[0];
> > +				dev_info.uid = obj->integer.value;
> > +				obj = &cnstr_pkg[1];
> > +				dev_info.min_dstate = obj-
> > >integer.value;
> > +				pr_debug("uid %d min_dstate %d\n",
> > +					 dev_info.uid,
> > +					 dev_info.min_dstate);
> > +				lpi_constraints_table[
> > +					lpi_constraints_table_size
> > ].min_dstate =
> > +						dev_info.min_dstat
> > e;
> > +				break;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		lpi_constraints_table_size++;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pr_debug("LPI: constraints dump end\n");
> > +free_acpi_buffer:
> > +	ACPI_FREE(out_obj);
> > +	return;
> > +
> > +free_constraints:
> > +	ACPI_FREE(out_obj);
> > +	for (i = 0; i < lpi_constraints_table_size; ++i)
> > +		kfree(lpi_constraints_table[i].name);
> > +	kfree(lpi_constraints_table);
> > +	lpi_constraints_table_size = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void lpi_check_constraints(void)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < lpi_constraints_table_size; ++i) {
> > +		acpi_handle handle;
> > +		struct acpi_device *adev;
> > +		int state, ret;
> > +
> > +		if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_handle(NULL,
> > +						 lpi_constraints_t
> > able[i].name,
> > +						 &handle)))
> > +			continue;
> So if you store the handle, the above won't be necessary.
> 
> > 
> > +
> > +		if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		ret = acpi_device_get_power(adev, &state);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			pr_debug("LPI: %s required min power state
> > %d, current power state %d, real power state [ERROR]\n",
> > +				 lpi_constraints_table[i].name,
> > +				 lpi_constraints_table[i].min_dsta
> > te,
> > +				 adev->power.state);
> > +		else
> > +			pr_debug("LPI: %s required min power state
> > %d, current power state %d, real power state %d\n",
> > +				 lpi_constraints_table[i].name,
> > +				 lpi_constraints_table[i].min_dsta
> > te,
> > +				 adev->power.state, state);
> I'm not convinced about the value of the above TBH.
> 
> Also in theory _PSC may go and access things like PCI config spaces
> of devices
> which isn't a good idea for devices in D3_cold, so maybe skip this?
OK.

> 
> > 
> > +
> > +		if (adev->flags.power_manageable && adev-
> > >power.state <
> > +					lpi_constraints_table[i].m
> > in_dstate)
> > +			pr_info("LPI: Constraint [%s] not
> > matched\n",
> "Constrant [%s] not met"?
> 
> Also I'd use acpi_handle_info(adev->handle, ...) to print this.
> 
> > 
> > +				 lpi_constraints_table[i].name);
> I would print a message if !flags.power_manageable, because it means
> we
> can't get the constraint right in general.
> 
> Also I would print both power.state and min_state (possibly using
> acpi_power_state_string()) in this message as that is valuable for
> debugging.
OK.

Thanks,
Srinivas


  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-12 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-11 18:23 [PATCH v3] ACPI / Sleep: Check low power idle constraints for debug only Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-08-12 14:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-12 15:59   ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2017-08-12 22:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-13  0:00       ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-08-13  0:54         ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1502553556.20268.47.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@dell.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.