From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC 00/12] Introduce housekeeping subsystem v2
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 03:50:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503453071-952-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
So after the feedback from the v1, I decided to take it one step further
and propose to re-implement isolcpus= on top of housekeeping. I expect
it to be controversial because it brings a behaviour change: isolcpus=
won't disable load balancing anymore. So you change the affinity of a
task at your own risk. OTOH it might make the implementation of isolcpus
more extendable, maybe more acceptable for a cpuset interface. I
leave you judge.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
core/isolation-v2
HEAD: 79ef9a911551a4f700b057ed794c223bd3a97d7b
Thanks,
Frederic
---
Frederic Weisbecker (12):
housekeeping: Move housekeeping related code to its own file
watchdog: Use housekeeping_cpumask() instead of ad-hoc version
housekeeping: Provide a dynamic off-case to housekeeping_any_cpu()
housekeeping: Make housekeeping cpumask private
housekeeping: Use its own static key
housekeeping: Rename is_housekeeping_cpu to housekeeping_cpu
housekeeping: Move it under own config, independant from NO_HZ
housekeeping: Introduce housekeeping flags
workqueue: Affine unbound workqueues to housekeeping cpumask
housekeeping: Affine unbound kthreads
housekeeping: Handle nohz_full= parameter
housekeeping: Reimplement isolcpus on housekeeping
drivers/base/cpu.c | 10 ++-
drivers/net/ethernet/tile/tilegx.c | 6 +-
include/linux/housekeeping.h | 52 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/sched.h | 2 -
include/linux/tick.h | 38 +----------
init/Kconfig | 7 +++
init/main.c | 2 +
kernel/Makefile | 1 +
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 13 +---
kernel/housekeeping.c | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/kthread.c | 5 +-
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 3 +-
kernel/rcu/update.c | 3 +-
kernel/sched/core.c | 25 ++------
kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 +-
kernel/sched/topology.c | 19 +-----
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 31 +--------
kernel/watchdog.c | 13 ++--
kernel/workqueue.c | 3 +-
19 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2017-08-23 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 1:50 Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] housekeeping: Move housekeeping related code to its own file Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-31 20:16 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-31 22:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] watchdog: Use housekeeping_cpumask() instead of ad-hoc version Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] housekeeping: Provide a dynamic off-case to housekeeping_any_cpu() Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] housekeeping: Make housekeeping cpumask private Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] housekeeping: Use its own static key Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] housekeeping: Rename is_housekeeping_cpu to housekeeping_cpu Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] housekeeping: Move it under own config, independant from NO_HZ Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] housekeeping: Introduce housekeeping flags Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] workqueue: Affine unbound workqueues to housekeeping cpumask Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] housekeeping: Affine unbound kthreads Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] housekeeping: Handle nohz_full= parameter Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] housekeeping: Reimplement isolcpus on housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 14:55 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-08-24 13:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-28 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 15:38 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-08-28 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 13:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-28 13:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 15:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-28 16:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 16:53 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-08-28 17:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-31 18:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-31 23:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1503453071-952-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.