All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 05/12] housekeeping: Use its own static key
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 03:51:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503453071-952-6-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503453071-952-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>

Housekeeping code still depends on nohz_full static key. Since we want
to decouple housekeeping from nohz, let's create a housekeeping own static
key. It's mostly relevant for calls to is_housekeeping_cpu() from the
scheduler.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/housekeeping.h |  3 ++-
 kernel/housekeeping.c        | 14 +++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/housekeeping.h b/include/linux/housekeeping.h
index 31a1401..cbe8d63 100644
--- a/include/linux/housekeeping.h
+++ b/include/linux/housekeeping.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/tick.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(housekeeping_overriden);
 extern int housekeeping_any_cpu(void);
 extern const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(void);
 extern void housekeeping_affine(struct task_struct *t);
@@ -31,7 +32,7 @@ static inline void housekeeping_init(void) { }
 static inline bool is_housekeeping_cpu(int cpu)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
-	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
 		return housekeeping_test_cpu(cpu);
 #endif
 	return true;
diff --git a/kernel/housekeeping.c b/kernel/housekeeping.c
index 0183e75..f8be7e6 100644
--- a/kernel/housekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/housekeeping.c
@@ -9,12 +9,15 @@
 #include <linux/housekeeping.h>
 #include <linux/tick.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/static_key.h>
 
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(housekeeping_overriden);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_overriden);
 static cpumask_var_t housekeeping_mask;
 
 int housekeeping_any_cpu(void)
 {
-	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
 		return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping_mask, cpu_online_mask);
 
 	return smp_processor_id();
@@ -22,7 +25,7 @@ int housekeeping_any_cpu(void)
 
 const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(void)
 {
-	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
 		return housekeeping_mask;
 
 	return cpu_possible_mask;
@@ -30,19 +33,18 @@ const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(void)
 
 void housekeeping_affine(struct task_struct *t)
 {
-	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
 		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(t, housekeeping_mask);
 }
 
 bool housekeeping_test_cpu(int cpu)
 {
-	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
 		return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, housekeeping_mask);
 
 	return true;
 }
 
-
 void __init housekeeping_init(void)
 {
 	if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
@@ -58,6 +60,8 @@ void __init housekeeping_init(void)
 	cpumask_andnot(housekeeping_mask,
 		       cpu_possible_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
 
+	static_branch_enable(&housekeeping_overriden);
+
 	/* We need at least one CPU to handle housekeeping work */
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(housekeeping_mask));
 }
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-23  1:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23  1:50 [RFC 00/12] Introduce housekeeping subsystem v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] housekeeping: Move housekeeping related code to its own file Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-31 20:16   ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-31 22:58     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] watchdog: Use housekeeping_cpumask() instead of ad-hoc version Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] housekeeping: Provide a dynamic off-case to housekeeping_any_cpu() Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] housekeeping: Make housekeeping cpumask private Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] housekeeping: Rename is_housekeeping_cpu to housekeeping_cpu Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] housekeeping: Move it under own config, independant from NO_HZ Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] housekeeping: Introduce housekeeping flags Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] workqueue: Affine unbound workqueues to housekeeping cpumask Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] housekeeping: Affine unbound kthreads Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] housekeeping: Handle nohz_full= parameter Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23  1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] housekeeping: Reimplement isolcpus on housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-23 14:55   ` Christopher Lameter
2017-08-24 13:19     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-28 10:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 15:38       ` Christopher Lameter
2017-08-28 10:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 13:23     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-28 13:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 15:27         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-28 16:24           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-28 16:53             ` Christopher Lameter
2017-08-28 17:33             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-08-31 18:53               ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-31 23:00                 ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1503453071-952-6-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.