From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libmultipath: sanitize fd handling
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:32:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505907169.4256.7.camel@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505456112-117105-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 08:15 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> One should remember that '0' _is_ a valid fd, so we need to set
> the fd to '-1' upon allocating the path structure and ensure we're
> checking for a value _smaller_ than 0 to detect an invalid fd.
>
> > diff --git a/libmultipath/checkers.c b/libmultipath/checkers.c
> > index 05e024f8..c32f7274 100644
> > --- a/libmultipath/checkers.c
> > +++ b/libmultipath/checkers.c
> > @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ struct checker * add_checker (char
> > *multipath_dir, char * name)
> > if (!c->repair)
> > goto out;
> >
> > - c->fd = 0;
> > + c->fd = -1;
> > c->sync = 1;
> > list_add(&c->node, &checkers);
> > return c;
> > @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ int checker_check (struct checker * c)
> > MSG(c, "checker disabled");
> > return PATH_UNCHECKED;
> > }
> > - if (c->fd <= 0) {
> > + if (c->fd < 0) {
> > MSG(c, "no usable fd");
> > return PATH_WILD;
> > }
> > diff --git a/libmultipath/print.c b/libmultipath/print.c
> > index 95dff90b..65a98247 100644
> > --- a/libmultipath/print.c
> > +++ b/libmultipath/print.c
> > @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ int snprint_status(char *buff, int len,
> struct
> > vectors *vecs)
> > int monitored_count = 0;
> >
> > vector_foreach_slot(vecs->pathvec, pp, i)
> > - if (pp->fd != -1)
> > + if (pp->fd >= 0)
> > monitored_count++;
> > fwd += snprintf(buff + fwd, len - fwd, "\npaths: %d\nbusy:
> > %s\n",
> > monitored_count, is_uevent_busy()? "True"
> :
> > "False");
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> ---
> libmultipath/checkers.c | 4 ++--
> libmultipath/print.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
There's one more wrong fd reference in
libmultipath/checkers/cciss_tur.c:76. And a nitpick: The comment in
checkers.h:14 should be fixed as well.
Apart from that: nice (although not strictly necessary, as multipathd
currently runs with fd 0 connected to /dev/null under normal
conditions).
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-20 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-15 6:15 [PATCH] libmultipath: sanitize fd handling Hannes Reinecke
2017-09-20 11:32 ` Martin Wilck [this message]
2017-09-20 20:24 ` Martin Wilck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1505907169.4256.7.camel@suse.com \
--to=mwilck@suse.com \
--cc=christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.