All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com>,
	"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@intel.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Chris Fries <cfries@google.com>,
	Dave Weinstein <olorin@google.com>,
	Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] printk: hash addresses printed with %p
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 21:06:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507694810.3552.45.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507693696-3777-1-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc>

On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 14:48 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> Currently there are many places in the kernel where addresses are being
> printed using an unadorned %p. Kernel pointers should be printed using
> %pK allowing some control via the kptr_restrict sysctl. Exposing addresses
> gives attackers sensitive information about the kernel layout in memory.
[]
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
[]
> @@ -1591,6 +1591,35 @@ char *device_node_string(char *buf, char *end, struct device_node *dn,
>  	return widen_string(buf, buf - buf_start, end, spec);
>  }
>  
> +static long get_random_odd_long(void)
> +{
> +	long val = 0;
> +
> +	while((val & 1) == 0) {
> +		val = get_random_long();
> +	}
> +
> +	return val;
> +}

Perhaps

static long get_random_odd_long(void)
{
	return get_random_long() | 1L;
}

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com>,
	"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@intel.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Chris Fries <cfries@google.com>,
	Dave Weinstein <olorin@google.com>,
	Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: hash addresses printed with %p
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 21:06:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507694810.3552.45.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507693696-3777-1-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc>

On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 14:48 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> Currently there are many places in the kernel where addresses are being
> printed using an unadorned %p. Kernel pointers should be printed using
> %pK allowing some control via the kptr_restrict sysctl. Exposing addresses
> gives attackers sensitive information about the kernel layout in memory.
[]
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
[]
> @@ -1591,6 +1591,35 @@ char *device_node_string(char *buf, char *end, struct device_node *dn,
>  	return widen_string(buf, buf - buf_start, end, spec);
>  }
>  
> +static long get_random_odd_long(void)
> +{
> +	long val = 0;
> +
> +	while((val & 1) == 0) {
> +		val = get_random_long();
> +	}
> +
> +	return val;
> +}

Perhaps

static long get_random_odd_long(void)
{
	return get_random_long() | 1L;
}

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-11  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-11  3:48 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH] printk: hash addresses printed with %p Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-11  3:48 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-11  3:48 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-11  4:06 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-10-11  4:06   ` Joe Perches
2017-10-12  2:24   ` [kernel-hardening] " Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-12  2:24     ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-12  2:24     ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-10-11 16:49 ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2017-10-11 16:49   ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-11 16:49   ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-11 17:48 ` [kernel-hardening] " Theodore Ts'o
2017-10-11 17:48   ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-10-12  2:55   ` [kernel-hardening] " Tobin C. Harding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1507694810.3552.45.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cfries@google.com \
    --cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@tobin.cc \
    --cc=olorin@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=tixxdz@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tycho@docker.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=william.c.roberts@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.