From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Gargi Sharma <gs051095@gmail.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
julia.lawall@lip6.fr, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mingo@kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@oracle.com,
ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, oleg@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
hch@infradead.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pid: Remove pidhash
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:15:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507731304.21121.185.camel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201710111737.ZHqmaPa5%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2750 bytes --]
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 17:47 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > '__compiletime_assert_33' declared with attribute error:
> > > BUILD_BUG_ON failed: sizeof(struct upid) != 32
>
> _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_,
> __LINE__)
> ^
> include/linux/compiler.h:556:4: note: in definition of macro
> '__compiletime_assert'
> prefix ## suffix(); \
> ^~~~~~
> include/linux/compiler.h:576:2: note: in expansion of macro
> '_compiletime_assert'
> _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_,
> __LINE__)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:46:37: note: in expansion of macro
> 'compiletime_assert'
> #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond),
> msg)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:70:2: note: in expansion of macro
> 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
> BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:33:2: note: in expansion of macro
> > > 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct upid) != 32);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>
Looks like arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.c throws a BUILD_BUG
if sizeof(struct upid) != 32.
Your patch reduced the size of struct upid, which is a nice
thing, but now IA64 no longer builds.
Lets see what IA64 was doing with the size of struct upid
in the first place:
in arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct upid) != 32);
DEFINE(IA64_UPID_SHIFT, 5);
Grepping for IA64_UPID_SHIFT leads us to some assembly
code implementing fsys_getpid (why is that in assembly?!):
add r8=IA64_PID_LEVEL_OFFSET,r17
;;
ld4 r8=[r8] // r8 = pid->level
add r17=IA64_PID_UPID_OFFSET,r17 // r17 = &pid->numbers[0]
;;
shl r8=r8,IA64_UPID_SHIFT
;;
add r17=r17,r8 // r17 = &pid->numbers[pid->level]
;;
ld4 r8=[r17] // r8 = pid->numbers[pid->level].nr
;;
mov r17=0
Luckily it looks like this is only referencing the first members of struct upid,
and you are removing the last member, so I suspect you will be fine changing the IA64
to this:
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct upid) != 16);
DEFINE(IA64_UPID_SHIFT, 4);
Tony, does that look ok to you?
--
All Rights Reversed.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Gargi Sharma <gs051095@gmail.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
julia.lawall@lip6.fr, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mingo@kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@oracle.com,
ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, oleg@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
hch@infradead.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pid: Remove pidhash
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:15:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507731304.21121.185.camel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201710111737.ZHqmaPa5%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2750 bytes --]
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 17:47 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > '__compiletime_assert_33' declared with attribute error:
> > > BUILD_BUG_ON failed: sizeof(struct upid) != 32
>
> _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_,
> __LINE__)
> ^
> include/linux/compiler.h:556:4: note: in definition of macro
> '__compiletime_assert'
> prefix ## suffix(); \
> ^~~~~~
> include/linux/compiler.h:576:2: note: in expansion of macro
> '_compiletime_assert'
> _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_,
> __LINE__)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:46:37: note: in expansion of macro
> 'compiletime_assert'
> #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond),
> msg)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:70:2: note: in expansion of macro
> 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
> BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:33:2: note: in expansion of macro
> > > 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct upid) != 32);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>
Looks like arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.c throws a BUILD_BUG
if sizeof(struct upid) != 32.
Your patch reduced the size of struct upid, which is a nice
thing, but now IA64 no longer builds.
Lets see what IA64 was doing with the size of struct upid
in the first place:
in arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct upid) != 32);
DEFINE(IA64_UPID_SHIFT, 5);
Grepping for IA64_UPID_SHIFT leads us to some assembly
code implementing fsys_getpid (why is that in assembly?!):
add r8=IA64_PID_LEVEL_OFFSET,r17
;;
ld4 r8=[r8] // r8 = pid->level
add r17=IA64_PID_UPID_OFFSET,r17 // r17 = &pid->numbers[0]
;;
shl r8=r8,IA64_UPID_SHIFT
;;
add r17=r17,r8 // r17 = &pid->numbers[pid->level]
;;
ld4 r8=[r17] // r8 = pid->numbers[pid->level].nr
;;
mov r17=0
Luckily it looks like this is only referencing the first members of struct upid,
and you are removing the last member, so I suspect you will be fine changing the IA64
to this:
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct upid) != 16);
DEFINE(IA64_UPID_SHIFT, 4);
Tony, does that look ok to you?
--
All Rights Reversed.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-11 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-09 21:13 [PATCH v4 0/2] Replacing PID bitmap implementation with IDR API Gargi Sharma
2017-10-09 21:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] pid: Replace pid " Gargi Sharma
2017-10-09 23:17 ` Andrew Morton
2017-10-10 11:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-10-10 12:35 ` Gargi Sharma
2017-10-10 14:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-10-10 15:46 ` Rik van Riel
2017-10-10 16:11 ` Gargi Sharma
2017-10-10 17:51 ` Rik van Riel
2017-10-10 13:44 ` Rik van Riel
2017-10-09 21:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] pid: Remove pidhash Gargi Sharma
2017-10-11 9:47 ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-11 14:15 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2017-10-11 14:15 ` Rik van Riel
2017-10-11 21:22 ` Luck, Tony
2017-10-11 21:22 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507731304.21121.185.camel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gs051095@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.