From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] i40e/i40evf: actually use u32 for feature flags
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:46:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507762016.6150.1.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171011140316.3802721-1-arnd@arndb.de>
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 16:02 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A previous cleanup intended to change the flags variable to 32
> bit instead of 64, but accidentally left out the important
> part of that change, leading to a build error:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.o: In function
> `i40e_set_priv_flags':
> i40e_ethtool.c:(.text+0x1a94): undefined reference to
> `wrong_size_cmpxchg'
>
> This adds the missing modification.
>
> Fixes: b74f571f59a8 ("i40e/i40evf: organize and re-number feature
> flags")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
To slow... :-) I had already sent a fix for this on Monday to David.
Check David Miller's net-next tree, it is already there.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>,
Filip Sadowski <filip.sadowski@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i40e/i40evf: actually use u32 for feature flags
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:46:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507762016.6150.1.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171011140316.3802721-1-arnd@arndb.de>
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 16:02 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A previous cleanup intended to change the flags variable to 32
> bit instead of 64, but accidentally left out the important
> part of that change, leading to a build error:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.o: In function
> `i40e_set_priv_flags':
> i40e_ethtool.c:(.text+0x1a94): undefined reference to
> `wrong_size_cmpxchg'
>
> This adds the missing modification.
>
> Fixes: b74f571f59a8 ("i40e/i40evf: organize and re-number feature
> flags")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
To slow... :-) I had already sent a fix for this on Monday to David.
Check David Miller's net-next tree, it is already there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-11 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-11 14:02 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] i40e/i40evf: actually use u32 for feature flags Arnd Bergmann
2017-10-11 14:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-10-11 22:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Keller, Jacob E
2017-10-11 22:21 ` Keller, Jacob E
2017-10-11 22:46 ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2017-10-11 22:46 ` Jeff Kirsher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507762016.6150.1.camel@intel.com \
--to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.