From: jbrunet@baylibre.com (Jerome Brunet)
To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: eMMC tuning issue on Odroid C2 and a possible solution
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 22:05:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507838745.16356.270.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa52e311-bafe-0a6a-1b85-ac8f40db62ed@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 21:49 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > The result of the tuning does not depends on starting point, so I don't
> > really
> > understand how it would significantly change things.
> >
>
> I think it depends on the tx phase starting point.
>
If the result of the tuning is not independent of the starting, instead of just
telling me, it is fairly easy for you to give actual result, like I asked you:
> > Ok, starting from Rx:0 Tx:270 then tuning gives you Tx:300 Rx:90
> > And what different did it gives you starting Rx:0/Tx:0 ?
And if the result are indeed vastly different, let's debug and get a real
explanation.
> Tuning does:
> rx phase tuning
> tx phase tuning
> rx phase tuning
>
> Result of each step depends on result of previous step.
Again, we don't agree.
> So also the initial
> rx phase tuning result depends on the starting point of tx phase.
The first Rx tuning is there only to get a sane starting point for the tx tuning
,as explained in the code. This is the reason why is not done when re-tuning.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..."
<linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: eMMC tuning issue on Odroid C2 and a possible solution
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 22:05:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507838745.16356.270.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa52e311-bafe-0a6a-1b85-ac8f40db62ed@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 21:49 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > The result of the tuning does not depends on starting point, so I don't
> > really
> > understand how it would significantly change things.
> >
>
> I think it depends on the tx phase starting point.
>
If the result of the tuning is not independent of the starting, instead of just
telling me, it is fairly easy for you to give actual result, like I asked you:
> > Ok, starting from Rx:0 Tx:270 then tuning gives you Tx:300 Rx:90
> > And what different did it gives you starting Rx:0/Tx:0 ?
And if the result are indeed vastly different, let's debug and get a real
explanation.
> Tuning does:
> rx phase tuning
> tx phase tuning
> rx phase tuning
>
> Result of each step depends on result of previous step.
Again, we don't agree.
> So also the initial
> rx phase tuning result depends on the starting point of tx phase.
The first Rx tuning is there only to get a sane starting point for the tx tuning
,as explained in the code. This is the reason why is not done when re-tuning.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-12 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-11 20:46 eMMC tuning issue on Odroid C2 and a possible solution Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-11 20:46 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-12 15:22 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-10-12 15:22 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-10-12 18:17 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-12 18:17 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-12 19:34 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-10-12 19:34 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-10-12 19:49 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-12 19:49 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-12 20:05 ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
2017-10-12 20:05 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-10-12 20:29 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-12 20:29 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-12 20:59 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-10-12 20:59 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-10-12 21:04 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-10-12 21:04 ` Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507838745.16356.270.camel@baylibre.com \
--to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.