From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/hfi1: Fix a wrapping test (make it less strict)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:33:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508783626.3325.16.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36cdf5bf-a28c-e853-523d-8cf0fa748a56@intel.com>
On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 13:57 -0400, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> On 10/23/2017 11:05 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 13:56 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > The "2 * UINT_MAX" overflows so the test is essentially doing
> > > this:
> > >
> > > if ((u64)(ts - cce->timestamp) > UINT_MAX - 1) {
> > >
> > > I've changed it to a 64bit type.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > > Not tested.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mad.c
> > > b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mad.c
> > > index f4c0ffc040cc..3aeea8afd44f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mad.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mad.c
> > > @@ -3781,7 +3781,7 @@ static int
> > > __subn_get_opa_hfi1_cong_log(struct
> > > opa_smp *smp, u32 am,
> > > * required to wrap the counter are supposed to
> > > * be zeroed (CA10-49 IBTA, release 1.2.1, V1).
> > > */
> > > - if ((u64)(ts - cce->timestamp) > (2 * UINT_MAX))
> > > + if ((u64)(ts - cce->timestamp) > (2ULL *
> > > UINT_MAX))
> > > continue;
> > > memcpy(cong_log->events[i].local_qp_cn_entry,
> > > &cce-
> > > > lqpn, 3);
> > >
> > > memcpy(cong_log-
> > > > events[i].remote_qp_number_cn_entry,
> >
> > Denny, I'm looking for feedback from you on this patch. This fixes
> > a
> > bug, my only concern is that the code used to work with the bug,
> > could
> > this make the code not work?
> >
>
> Mike and I have been looking at this. The code seems to work as it
> is
> but fails with Dan's patch. We are still looking at it, but I'd
> advise
> against pulling just yet. It's not something for 4.14.
That's what I was afraid of: by fixing a C language bug, you expose the
fact that there is a subtle logic bug that's only been working because
of the C language bug ;-).
I'll hold off until you send this patch through with whatever
incremental changes are needed elsewhere to make it work.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/hfi1: Fix a wrapping test (make it less strict)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:33:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508783626.3325.16.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36cdf5bf-a28c-e853-523d-8cf0fa748a56@intel.com>
On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 13:57 -0400, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> On 10/23/2017 11:05 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 13:56 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > The "2 * UINT_MAX" overflows so the test is essentially doing
> > > this:
> > >
> > > if ((u64)(ts - cce->timestamp) > UINT_MAX - 1) {
> > >
> > > I've changed it to a 64bit type.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > > Not tested.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mad.c
> > > b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mad.c
> > > index f4c0ffc040cc..3aeea8afd44f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mad.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mad.c
> > > @@ -3781,7 +3781,7 @@ static int
> > > __subn_get_opa_hfi1_cong_log(struct
> > > opa_smp *smp, u32 am,
> > > * required to wrap the counter are supposed to
> > > * be zeroed (CA10-49 IBTA, release 1.2.1, V1).
> > > */
> > > - if ((u64)(ts - cce->timestamp) > (2 * UINT_MAX))
> > > + if ((u64)(ts - cce->timestamp) > (2ULL *
> > > UINT_MAX))
> > > continue;
> > > memcpy(cong_log->events[i].local_qp_cn_entry,
> > > &cce-
> > > > lqpn, 3);
> > >
> > > memcpy(cong_log-
> > > > events[i].remote_qp_number_cn_entry,
> >
> > Denny, I'm looking for feedback from you on this patch. This fixes
> > a
> > bug, my only concern is that the code used to work with the bug,
> > could
> > this make the code not work?
> >
>
> Mike and I have been looking at this. The code seems to work as it
> is
> but fails with Dan's patch. We are still looking at it, but I'd
> advise
> against pulling just yet. It's not something for 4.14.
That's what I was afraid of: by fixing a C language bug, you expose the
fact that there is a subtle logic bug that's only been working because
of the C language bug ;-).
I'll hold off until you send this patch through with whatever
incremental changes are needed elsewhere to make it work.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-23 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-13 10:56 [PATCH] IB/hfi1: Fix a wrapping test (make it less strict) Dan Carpenter
2017-10-13 10:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-23 15:05 ` Doug Ledford
2017-10-23 15:05 ` Doug Ledford
[not found] ` <1508771116.3325.0.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-10-23 17:57 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2017-10-23 17:57 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2017-10-23 18:33 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2017-10-23 18:33 ` Doug Ledford
2017-10-23 19:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-23 19:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-24 19:54 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
[not found] ` <32E1700B9017364D9B60AED9960492BC3443EB1C-RjuIdWtd+YbTXloPLtfHfbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2017-10-24 20:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-24 20:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20171024200216.GA15994-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2017-10-24 20:03 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2017-10-24 20:03 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2017-10-25 5:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-25 5:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-25 5:14 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-25 5:14 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1508783626.3325.16.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@intel.com \
--cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.marciniszyn@intel.com \
--cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.